Department of Plastic & Laser Cosmetic, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha, China.
Gold Skin Care Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Mar;21(3):979-990. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14732. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
The use of fractional CO laser and pulsed dye laser (PDL) therapy to treat and/or prevent scarring following burn injury is becoming more widespread with a number of studies reporting reduction in scar erythema and pruritus following treatment with lasers. The objective of this study was to directly compare the efficacy of PDL, fractional CO , and PDL and fractional CO laser therapy in immature red hypertrophic scars in a standardized animal model.
Ten New Zealand big-eared rabbits were used to make rabbit ear hypertrophic scar models. A total of 80 hypertrophic scar models were obtained and randomly divided into groups: control (Group A), Fractional CO laser (Group B), pulse dye laser (Group C), combined (Group D), 20 in each group. Wound sites were treated with PDL, Fractional CO laser, or both at 28 days post-grafting. Grafts receiving no laser therapy served as controls. Hypertrophic scar appearance, morphology, size, and erythema were assessed, and punch biopsies were collected. At days 7 and 28, additional tissue was collected for biomechanical analyses and markers for HE staining, Masson staining, immunohistochemical method to determine the CD31 content in the scar; Western blot to detect the expression of VEGF protein in scars. After the day 7 and 28, the scars were collected. Histomorphological change in scars was observed by hematoxylin-eosin staining, Masson staining. The expression of CD31, VEGF protein, and the cell apoptosis rate was detected by immunohistochemical method.
(i) In morphological observation, HE staining and Masson staining, both the number of fibroblasts and amount of collagen fibrils in the experimental group were significantly reduced compared with those in control group. (ii) Micro-vessel Density (MVD) value can be found much smaller in the experimental groups than the control (p < 0.05). Among the four experimental groups, there was a significant difference among 14d, 21d, and 28d groups (p < 0.05). (iii) On days 7 and 28 after treatment, expression of VEGF could be regulated in experimental group (p < 0.05). Among the three experimental groups, the decrease of VEGF in the combined group was significantly stronger than that of the other two.
The effect of Fractional CO laser combined with pulsed dye laser treatment was shown to be better than that of Fractional CO laser or pulsed dye laser alone and inhibits the early hypertrophic scar in rabbit ears.
越来越多的研究报道,使用分数 CO 激光和脉冲染料激光(PDL)治疗烧伤后瘢痕可以减少瘢痕红斑和瘙痒,因此,采用分数 CO 激光和 PDL 治疗烧伤后瘢痕的方法越来越广泛。本研究的目的是在标准化动物模型中直接比较 PDL、分数 CO 和 PDL 与分数 CO 激光治疗未成熟红色增生性瘢痕的疗效。
10 只新西兰大耳兔用于制作兔耳增生性瘢痕模型。共获得 80 个增生性瘢痕模型,随机分为 4 组:对照组(A 组)、分数 CO 激光组(B 组)、脉冲染料激光组(C 组)、联合组(D 组),每组 20 个。移植后 28 天对创面进行 PDL、分数 CO 激光或两者联合治疗。未接受激光治疗的移植物作为对照。评估增生性瘢痕的外观、形态、大小和红斑,并采集活检标本。第 7 天和第 28 天,收集额外的组织进行生物力学分析和免疫组化法检测瘢痕中 CD31 的含量;采用 Western blot 法检测瘢痕中 VEGF 蛋白的表达。第 7 天和第 28 天,收集瘢痕组织。采用苏木精-伊红染色、Masson 染色观察瘢痕的组织形态学变化。采用免疫组化法检测 CD31、VEGF 蛋白的表达及细胞凋亡率。
(i)在形态学观察中,实验组 HE 染色和 Masson 染色的成纤维细胞数量和胶原纤维数量明显低于对照组。(ii)微血管密度(MVD)值实验组明显小于对照组(p<0.05)。在 4 个实验组中,14d、21d 和 28d 组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。(iii)治疗后 7 天和 28 天,实验组 VEGF 的表达可被调节(p<0.05)。在 3 个实验组中,联合组 VEGF 的减少明显强于其他两组。
与单独使用分数 CO 激光或脉冲染料激光相比,分数 CO 激光联合脉冲染料激光治疗的效果更好,并抑制兔耳早期增生性瘢痕。