Furnival-Adams Joanna, Houana Amelia, Nicolas Patricia, Montaña Julia, Martinho Samuel, Casellas Aina, Mundaca Hansel, Mbanze Jenisse, Soares Arlindo, Imputiua Saimado, Ruiz-Castillo Paula, Ribes Marta, Sanz Almudena, Salé Mussa Mamudo, Macucha Antonio, Elobolobo Eldo, Vegove Vegovito, Mutepa Victor, Munguambe Humberto, Xerinda Aida, Materula Felisbela, Rabinovich Regina, Saute Francisco, Chaccour Carlos
IsGlobal, Barcelona Institute for Global Health, Barcelona, Spain.
Facultat de Medicina I Ciències de La Salut (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences), Universitat de Barcelona (University of Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2025 Mar 27;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40249-025-01290-z.
Headlice are prevalent worldwide, with a higher burden in rural, lower-middle income settings. They can cause intense itchiness, discomfort, and secondary bacterial infections with potentially serious consequences. Ivermectin is efficacious against headlice, and is also being evaluated as a malaria vector control tool. In this study, we explored risk factors for headlice, and assessed the efficacy of ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA) designed for malaria against headlice.
We conducted an open-label, assessor-blind, cluster-randomized controlled trial in Mopeia, Mozambique. A single dose of ivermectin was given monthly to eligible humans or humans and livestock (humans: 400 μg/kg, livestock: 1% injectable 200 μg/kg) in 3 consecutive months during the rainy season. The control group received albendazole (humans only). Thirty-nine clusters (13 per arm) were randomly selected for the nested assessment of headlice prevalence. 1341 treated participants were followed up at least once, 1, 2 and 3 months and 382 untreated (ineligible) participants at 3 and 6 months after the first MDA round. Headlice diagnosis was determined by scalp examination. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for headlice at baseline, and to estimate the treatment effect at each time point.
A total of 1309 participants were included in the main analysis assessing ivermectin MDA efficacy, and 1332 in the risk factor analysis. The baseline headlice prevalence was 11%. Risk factors included living with a household member with head itch [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 48.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 28.7-82.3, P-value < 0.0001], being female (aOR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.33-3.80, P-value < 0.01), and using surface water as the main water (aOR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.12-5.33, P-value = 0.04). The treated population receiving ivermectin had significantly lower odds of having headlice at 3 months compared to those receiving albendazole (aOR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.91, P-value = 0.04). There was no indirect effect on headlice among children ineligible for treatment.
In a highly endemic setting, mass drug administration with ivermectin significantly reduces headlice infestation prevalence among those who receive the drug for three sequential months. The lack of effect among untreated, ineligible children implies that additional interventions would be needed to interrupt local transmission.
This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04966702).
头虱在全球范围内普遍存在,在农村、中低收入地区负担更重。它们会引起剧烈瘙痒、不适以及继发性细菌感染,可能产生严重后果。伊维菌素对头虱有效,也正在作为疟疾媒介控制工具进行评估。在本研究中,我们探讨了头虱的危险因素,并评估了为疟疾设计的伊维菌素群体药物给药(MDA)对头虱的疗效。
我们在莫桑比克的莫佩亚进行了一项开放标签、评估者盲法、整群随机对照试验。在雨季连续3个月每月给符合条件的人或人和牲畜单次服用伊维菌素(人:400μg/kg,牲畜:1%注射用200μg/kg)。对照组仅接受阿苯达唑(仅用于人)。随机选择39个群组(每组13个)对头虱流行情况进行嵌套评估。在第一轮MDA后1、2和3个月,对1341名接受治疗的参与者至少随访一次,在3个月和6个月对382名未治疗(不符合条件)的参与者进行随访。通过头皮检查确定头虱诊断。使用逻辑回归确定基线时头虱的危险因素,并估计每个时间点的治疗效果。
共有1309名参与者纳入评估伊维菌素MDA疗效的主要分析,1332名参与者纳入危险因素分析。基线时头虱患病率为11%。危险因素包括与有头部瘙痒的家庭成员同住[调整优势比(aOR)=48.63,95%置信区间(CI):28.7 - 82.3,P值<0.0001]、女性(aOR = 2.25,95%CI:1.33 - 3.80,P值<0.01)以及以地表水作为主要水源(aOR = 2.37,95%CI:1.12 - 5.33,P值=0.04)。与接受阿苯达唑的人群相比,接受伊维菌素治疗的人群在3个月时感染头虱的几率显著更低(aOR = 0.19,95%CI:0.04 - 0.91,P值=0.04)。对不符合治疗条件的儿童的头虱没有间接影响。
在高度流行的环境中,连续3个月使用伊维菌素进行群体药物给药可显著降低接受该药物人群的头虱感染率。未治疗的不符合条件儿童未出现效果,这意味着需要额外的干预措施来阻断当地传播。
本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04966702)。