Seaborne Henry J, Chehab Lara Z, Rajapuram Nikhil, Sammann Amanda
The Better Lab, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
College of Letters and Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06770-2.
The strenuous demands of medical education often lead to adverse mental health outcomes among students. Despite extensive research on medical student distress, the unique challenges faced by students with disabilities remain understudied. This study aims to investigate the well-being of medical students with and without disabilities, by comparing levels of distress, risk and protective factors, and modifiable variables' impact on distress.
From September 2019 to February 2020, we implemented an exploratory observational study to survey medical students across the US, US territories, and Caribbean. Participants completed the Medical Student Wellbeing Survey (MSWS), which was used to assess well-being and capture extensive demographic data on these students. We retrospectively sorted participant data into cohorts based on disability status, then compared them using rates of well-being outcomes, logistic regression, and interaction analyses. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify significant predictors of severe distress, burnout, and depression.
Of the 3162 medical student participants, 277 identified as having a disability. Respondents with disabilities reported significantly higher rates of severe distress (65%) compared to their non-disabled peers (51.3%). Additionally, burnout and depression rates were higher among disabled students, with 80.41% experiencing burnout and 54.84% experiencing depression. Logistic regression revealed that certain identities, as well as high debt and tuition costs, were significant predictors of severe distress across cohorts. Uniquely, marital status emerged as a protective factor specifically for students with disabilities.
Medical students with disabilities exhibit higher levels of severe distress, burnout, and depression than their non-disabled counterparts. Current interventions and modifiable factors are insufficient in lessening severe distress for these students. These findings highlight the necessity for tailored support strategies and structural interventions to improve the well-being of medical students with disabilities, especially for those with intersecting vulnerable identities.
This study does not report the results of a health care intervention on human participants, so trial registration is not required.
医学教育的高强度要求常常导致学生出现不良心理健康状况。尽管对医学生的困扰进行了广泛研究,但残疾学生面临的独特挑战仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在通过比较困扰程度、风险和保护因素以及可改变变量对困扰的影响,调查残疾和非残疾医学生的幸福感。
2019年9月至2020年2月,我们开展了一项探索性观察研究,对美国、美国属地和加勒比地区的医学生进行调查。参与者完成了医学生幸福感调查(MSWS),该调查用于评估幸福感并收集这些学生的广泛人口统计学数据。我们根据残疾状况将参与者数据回顾性地分为不同队列,然后使用幸福感结果发生率、逻辑回归和交互分析对它们进行比较。我们进行逻辑回归分析以确定严重困扰、职业倦怠和抑郁的重要预测因素。
在3162名医学生参与者中,277人被认定为残疾。与非残疾同龄人(51.3%)相比,残疾受访者报告的严重困扰发生率显著更高(65%)。此外,残疾学生的职业倦怠和抑郁发生率更高,分别有80.41%经历职业倦怠,54.84%经历抑郁。逻辑回归显示,某些身份特征以及高债务和学费成本是各队列中严重困扰的重要预测因素。独特的是,婚姻状况成为专门针对残疾学生的保护因素。
残疾医学生比非残疾医学生表现出更高水平的严重困扰、职业倦怠和抑郁。目前的干预措施和可改变因素在减轻这些学生的严重困扰方面并不充分。这些发现凸显了制定针对性支持策略和结构性干预措施以改善残疾医学生幸福感的必要性,特别是对于那些具有交叉脆弱身份的学生。
本研究未报告对人类参与者的医疗保健干预结果,因此无需进行试验注册。