Hlodak Jan, Madarasova Geckova Andrea, Carnakovic Simona, Feketeova Eva
Comenius University, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Institute of Applied Psychology, Bratislava, Slovakia.
University of Pavol Jozef Safarik, Medical faculty, Institute of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Kosice, Slovakia.
Sleep Breath. 2025 Feb 8;29(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s11325-025-03259-6.
Narcolepsy impacts quality of life (QoL) with its symptomatology in hobbies and everyday activities, work and productivity and has social and economic consequences. The aim of this review is to map and synthesize evidence about QoL in narcolepsy patients and to focus on research strategies and publications in the matter.
A scoping review of articles published between 2014-2025. The initial search of WoS resulted in 7748 articles and 2583 in PubMed being screened for eligibility. Intervention, comorbidity, non-narcolepsy, prevalence and medical trials studies were excluded. We extracted data on bibliometric characteristics, research questions, sample and recruitment method, design, concepts and measures, and the main findings. Two independent reviewers did the screening and analyses. The analyzed data were consulted on with stakeholders to settle gaps, possibilities and directions for future research. This study followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Twenty papers were included in this study. There is an increasing trend in publishing studies focused on QoL in narcolepsy patients, but its spread is very limited across various audiences. Most of the studies assess the association of narcolepsy symptoms, treatment, mental health or nutritional status and QoL in narcolepsy patients. Most used was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional design comparing a control group vs narcolepsy patients recruited through regular follow up at a sleep clinic or national reference centers or patients' organization.
There is a need to spread knowledge beyond the neurology audience, to widen the scope of research beyond the burden of the symptoms and to employ explorative qualitative designs.
发作性睡病通过其在爱好、日常活动、工作和生产力方面的症状影响生活质量(QoL),并产生社会和经济后果。本综述的目的是梳理和综合关于发作性睡病患者生活质量的证据,并关注该领域的研究策略和出版物。
对2014年至2025年发表的文章进行范围综述。最初在Web of Science中检索到7748篇文章,在PubMed中筛选出2583篇文章以确定其是否符合资格。排除干预、合并症、非发作性睡病、患病率和医学试验研究。我们提取了关于文献计量特征、研究问题、样本和招募方法、设计、概念和测量以及主要发现的数据。两名独立评审员进行筛选和分析。就分析的数据与利益相关者进行了磋商,以解决未来研究的差距、可能性和方向。本研究遵循PRISMA-ScR指南。
本研究纳入了20篇论文。关注发作性睡病患者生活质量的研究发表呈上升趋势,但其在不同受众中的传播非常有限。大多数研究评估了发作性睡病症状、治疗、心理健康或营养状况与发作性睡病患者生活质量之间的关联。最常用的是基于问卷的横断面设计,比较通过睡眠诊所或国家参考中心或患者组织的定期随访招募的对照组与发作性睡病患者。
有必要将知识传播到神经学领域之外的受众,扩大研究范围,超越症状负担,并采用探索性定性设计。