Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Sleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Sleep Med. 2024 Apr;116:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.02.026. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
Understanding how persons with narcolepsy conceptualize symptoms, daily impact and illness experience is key to facilitating dialogue between patients and healthcare professionals. These concepts are usually explored from the perspective of healthcare professionals/researchers and rarely from the perspective of those with narcolepsy.
127 self-reported persons with narcolepsy were recruited from an Australian patient support group. A short demographic survey was completed. All agreed to participate in a subsequent 1:1 semi-structured interview. Saturation was reached after 24 interviews (mean age = 33 years (SD 11) with 44% reporting cataplexy). A multidisciplinary team of researchers/clinicians analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis.
Participants perceived physical fatigue, sleepiness, and two separate experiences of 'falling asleep/sleep attacks' as distinct symptoms rather than a multidimensional construct (i.e. excessive daytime sleepiness). We also identified two experiences of cataplexy, one triggered by acute emotion and another by a stressor. Participants determined their narcolepsy to be 'well-managed' by the level of functional impairment rather than the frequency of any symptom. Almost all participants described experiencing anticipated stigma and internalized or 'self-' stigma, likely stemming from societal devaluation of sleep and the conflation of sleepiness with laziness.
Descriptions of common symptoms often differed between participants and the existing literature. These differences likely impact patient-physician communication, with both parties utilizing the same terminology to communicate different concepts. The characterization of stigma in narcolepsy presents opportunities for future research exploring the impact and possible development of interventions to reduce the substantial psychological comorbidity in persons with narcolepsy.
了解发作性睡病患者如何概念化症状、日常影响和疾病体验对于促进患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的对话至关重要。这些概念通常是从医疗保健专业人员/研究人员的角度来探讨的,而很少从发作性睡病患者的角度来探讨。
从澳大利亚的一个患者支持小组招募了 127 名自我报告的发作性睡病患者。完成了简短的人口统计学调查。所有参与者都同意随后进行 1:1 的半结构化访谈。在完成 24 次访谈后达到了饱和(平均年龄为 33 岁(标准差为 11),44%的人报告猝倒)。一个多学科的研究人员/临床医生团队使用主题分析方法分析了访谈记录。
参与者认为身体疲劳、嗜睡和两种不同的“入睡/睡眠发作”体验是不同的症状,而不是多维结构(即白天过度嗜睡)。我们还确定了两种猝倒体验,一种是由急性情绪触发的,另一种是由压力源触发的。参与者根据功能障碍的程度而不是任何症状的频率来确定他们的发作性睡病是“管理良好”的。几乎所有参与者都描述了经历预期的耻辱感和内化或“自我”耻辱感,这可能源于社会对睡眠的贬低以及将嗜睡与懒惰混为一谈。
常见症状的描述在参与者和现有文献之间经常存在差异。这些差异可能会影响医患沟通,双方都使用相同的术语来传达不同的概念。发作性睡病耻辱感的特征为未来研究提供了机会,探索干预措施的影响和可能的发展,以减轻发作性睡病患者的大量心理共病。