• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为一线医护人员制定并试行同伴质量改进指导方案。

Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff.

作者信息

Popivanov Petar, McCarthy Siobhan Eithne, Finn Mairead

机构信息

Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

RCSI University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 8;14(1):e002967. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967
PMID:39922686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11808875/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improving the quality of patient care remains a global necessity. Despite system and professional benefits, current evidence indicates that the spread of improvement principles among front-line healthcare workers remains poor.While education and training alone are unlikely to result in consistent improvement practice, coaching can play a critical role in sustainable, evidence-based improvement implementation. Peer quality improvement coaching (PQIC) places the power and agency in the shared relationship between coach and coachee to shape coachee quality improvement (QI) outcomes.Study objective was to develop and pilot an evidence-based protocol for implementation and evaluation of a PQIC for front-line staff engaged in small to intermediate improvement efforts.

METHODS

We conducted a multistage case-study design and implementation process. First, a systematised literature review identified themes about the theory and practice of QI coaching (QIC). Second, these themes guided the development of a PQIC protocol. Finally, the protocol was piloted and evaluated among staff in a single-centre tertiary maternity hospital. PQIC effectiveness was assessed using evaluation tools identified in the literature.

RESULTS

Effectiveness; strategies and models; moderating factors and methods for evaluation of QIC emerged from the literature. Together with Bloom's taxonomy and Kirkpatrick's educational model, these themes informed the development of this PQIC protocol. It was piloted in three steps: education, coaching and evaluation. A survey revealed that the participants in the education step achieved excellent scores. Following the coaching journey, the coached multidisciplinary team leaders completed their improvement initiatives and demonstrated increased QI knowledge and skills measured by the 'IHI improvement advisor self-assessment tool' and 'IHI assessment scale for collaboratives'.

CONCLUSION

Built on established education, peer coaching and QI concepts, this evidence-based PQIC protocol adds to international evidence on how to support front-line healthcare workers in their improvement efforts. Future research needs to assess protocol effectiveness across different settings.

摘要

背景

提高患者护理质量仍是全球的一项必要任务。尽管有系统和专业方面的益处,但目前的证据表明,改进原则在一线医护人员中的传播情况仍然不佳。虽然仅靠教育和培训不太可能带来持续的改进实践,但辅导在基于证据的可持续改进实施中可以发挥关键作用。同伴质量改进辅导(PQIC)将权力和能动性置于辅导者与被辅导者之间的共享关系中,以塑造被辅导者的质量改进(QI)成果。研究目的是制定并试行一项基于证据的方案,用于对参与小型至中型改进工作的一线员工实施和评估PQIC。

方法

我们进行了一个多阶段的案例研究设计和实施过程。首先,系统的文献综述确定了关于QI辅导(QIC)理论和实践的主题。其次,这些主题指导了PQIC方案的制定。最后,该方案在一家单中心三级妇产医院的员工中进行了试行和评估。使用文献中确定的评估工具评估PQIC的有效性。

结果

文献中出现了QIC的有效性、策略和模式、调节因素及评估方法。这些主题与布鲁姆分类法和柯克帕特里克教育模式一起,为该PQIC方案的制定提供了参考。它分三个步骤进行试行:教育、辅导和评估。一项调查显示,教育步骤中的参与者取得了优异成绩。在经历辅导过程后,接受辅导的多学科团队领导完成了他们的改进计划,并通过“IHI改进顾问自我评估工具”和“IHI协作评估量表”显示出QI知识和技能有所提高。

结论

基于既定的教育、同伴辅导和QI概念,这个基于证据的PQIC方案为如何支持一线医护人员进行改进工作增添了国际证据。未来的研究需要评估该方案在不同环境中的有效性。

相似文献

1
Developing and piloting a peer quality improvement coaching protocol for front-line healthcare staff.为一线医护人员制定并试行同伴质量改进指导方案。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Feb 8;14(1):e002967. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002967.
2
Toolkit and distance coaching strategies: a mixed methods evaluation of a trial to implement care coordination quality improvement projects in primary care.工具包和远程指导策略:一项在初级保健中实施护理协调质量改进项目的试验的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 14;21(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06850-1.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Factors influencing measurement for improvement skills in healthcare staff: trainee, and trainer perspectives.影响医疗保健人员改进技能测量的因素:受训者和培训师的观点。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03282-1.
5
Optimizing the Implementation of Surgical Coaching Through Feedback From Practicing Surgeons.通过实践外科医生的反馈来优化手术指导的实施。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):42-49. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4581.
6
Quality Improvement Coaching for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Coverage: A Process Evaluation in 3 States, 2018-2019.质量改进教练法在人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种覆盖率中的应用:2018-2019 年 3 个州的过程评估。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 8;17:E120. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190410.
7
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
8
Reciprocal peer coaching for practice improvement in surgery: a pilot study.手术实践改进中的互惠同行指导:一项试点研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7187-7203. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09056-6. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
9
Scalable and successful patient portal lifestyle coaching training for primary care clinical staff.可扩展且成功的针对初级保健临床医务人员的患者门户生活方式辅导培训。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;14(11):661-672. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae047.
10
Integrated clinical and quality improvement coaching in Son La Province, Vietnam: a model of building public sector capacity for sustainable HIV care delivery.越南山萝省的综合临床与质量改进指导:建立公共部门可持续提供艾滋病毒护理能力的模式
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 17;15:269. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0935-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the Quality of Health Care in Special Neonatal Care Units of India: A Before and After Intervention Study.改善印度特殊新生儿护理单元的医疗质量:一项干预前后研究。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Oct 31;10(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00085.
2
Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.一线的持续质量改进:一个跨学科临床团队在完成虚拟学习项目后的四年历程。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 27;6(4):e10345. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10345. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Tracheostomy Thursday: Journey of a Staff-driven COVID-19 Initiative to International Recognition.
周四行气管切开术:一项由员工推动的 COVID-19 倡议走向国际认可的历程。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022 Sep 1;35(9):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000855032.27670.be.
4
Bloom's Classification of Educational Objectives Based on Deep Learning Theory Teaching Design of Nursing Specialty.基于深度学习理论的布鲁姆教育目标分类学在护理专业教学中的教学设计。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 21;2022:3324477. doi: 10.1155/2022/3324477. eCollection 2022.
5
Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Coaching on Process Outcomes in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.质量改进辅导在医疗保健环境中对流程结果的有效性:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):885-899. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07217-2. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
6
Toolkit and distance coaching strategies: a mixed methods evaluation of a trial to implement care coordination quality improvement projects in primary care.工具包和远程指导策略:一项在初级保健中实施护理协调质量改进项目的试验的混合方法评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 14;21(1):817. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06850-1.
7
An innovative intervention to improve respectful maternity care in three Districts in Ethiopia.一项创新干预措施,以改善埃塞俄比亚三个地区的尊重产妇护理服务。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03934-y.
8
Program for Supporting Frontline Improvement Projects in an Academic Radiology Department.支持学术放射科一线改进项目的计划。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):235-244. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23421. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
9
Does coaching matter? Examining the impact of specific practice facilitation strategies on implementation of quality improvement interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland study.辅导是否重要?在“心脏地带健康之心”研究中,考察特定实践促进策略对改善干预措施实施的影响。
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 31;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01100-8.
10
Professionals' management of the fidelity-adaptation dilemma in the use of evidence-based interventions-an intervention study.专业人员在使用循证干预措施时对保真度-适应性困境的管理——一项干预研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Mar 16;2(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00131-y.