Sanchis Juan, Bueno Hector, Martí Sánchez David, Martinez-Selles Manuel, Díez Villanueva Pablo, Barrabes Jose A, Marín Francisco, Villa Adolfo, Sanmartin Fernandez Marcelo, Llibre Cinta, Sionis Alessandro, Elizaga Jaime, Alfonso Fernando, Nuñez Eduardo, Núñez Julio, Kunadian Vijay, Ariza-Solé Albert
Cardiology, Hospital Clínic Universitari, INCLIVA, Universitat de València, CIBERCV, València, Spain
Centro Nacional de InvestigacionesCardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain.
Heart. 2025 Jul 28;111(16):786-792. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254.
Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients.
The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified.
The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70).
In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.
NCT03208153.
临床试验和荟萃分析表明,对于老年非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者,侵入性治疗可降低再梗死风险。本研究调查了在体弱患者中是否也能观察到类似益处。
急性冠状动脉综合征合并虚弱 - FRAIL(MOSCA - FRAIL)试验纳入了167名年龄≥70岁且体弱(临床衰弱量表≥4分)的NSTEMI成人患者,他们在首次住院期间被随机分配至侵入性治疗组(n = 84)或保守治疗组(n = 83)。本次亚分析的主要终点是再梗死,将全因死亡视为竞争事件,中位随访3年。考虑首次再梗死时间以及所有再梗死(首次和复发)时间。该子研究未预先设定。
死亡总数(93例,56%)超过首次再梗死数(32例,19%)。将死亡作为竞争风险进行分析时,侵入性治疗并未影响再梗死风险(亚分布风险比 = 0.87,95%置信区间0.54至1.40,p = 0.56)。侵入性治疗最初会增加死亡风险(在第131天至175天之间显著),但随着时间推移死亡风险会降低。共观察到45例再梗死(首次和复发)。纵向轨迹证实,侵入性策略并未随着时间推移降低再梗死风险(p = 0.72)。然而,死亡率呈双相模式,侵入性治疗组在前6个月死亡率较高,在9个月至3年期间死亡率降低(整个时间依赖性轨迹分析p =
0.05)。侵入性策略与保守策略的胜率为1.08(95%置信区间0.72至1.63,p = 0.70)。
在体弱的老年NSTEMI患者中,3年随访时常规侵入性治疗并未降低再梗死风险。与体弱相关的高全因死亡率可能会限制侵入性治疗的效果。由于样本量有限以及存在II类错误风险,这些发现应被视为提出假设。
NCT03208153。