Türközer Halide Bilge, Guvenek-Cokol Perihan Esra, Millman Zachary B, Dickstein Daniel, Öngür Dost
McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;19(2):e70019. doi: 10.1111/eip.70019.
Family history is amongst the most significant risk factors for psychotic and bipolar disorders. Despite being clearly defined, easily and early identifiable, familial high-risk status is minimally accounted for in mainstream prevention paradigms. This study reports on the demographics and clinical characteristics of youth with a first-degree relative affected by psychotic or bipolar disorders within a large academic healthcare system.
In this quality improvement study, using electronic medical records, the authors examined demographics, psychiatric and medical diagnoses, substance use, service utilisation, and psychotropic medication use in children, adolescents and young adults (age 24 or younger) with and without a family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders within the Mass General Brigham (MGB) healthcare system.
Family history-positive (FHP) youth demonstrated markedly higher rates of psychiatric problems (57.8%) compared to family history-negative (FHN) youth (8.5%), including higher rates of psychotic and bipolar disorders, as well as anxiety disorders and depression. FHP youth also had more frequent psychotropic medication use and medical problems. Additionally, FHP youth reported higher cannabis and alcohol use, along with higher rates of suicidal ideation and trauma. Despite this, only 4% of FHP youth visited an MGB psychiatry or psychology department within the six months preceding the analysis.
FHP youth constitute a distinct and practically identifiable risk cohort within a large academic healthcare system. Increased psychiatric and medical problems coupled with more prevalent risk factors amongst familial high-risk youth highlight the need for tailored clinical programmes to achieve both primary and secondary prevention.
家族病史是精神病性障碍和双相情感障碍最重要的风险因素之一。尽管家族高风险状态定义明确、易于早期识别,但在主流预防模式中却很少被考虑。本研究报告了在一个大型学术医疗系统中,有精神病性障碍或双相情感障碍一级亲属的青少年的人口统计学和临床特征。
在这项质量改进研究中,作者利用电子病历,对麻省总医院布莱根分院(MGB)医疗系统中有或无精神病性障碍或双相情感障碍家族病史的儿童、青少年和年轻人(24岁及以下)的人口统计学、精神科和医学诊断、物质使用、服务利用及精神药物使用情况进行了检查。
与家族史阴性(FHN)的青少年(8.5%)相比,家族史阳性(FHP)的青少年出现精神问题的比率显著更高(57.8%),包括精神病性障碍和双相情感障碍、焦虑症及抑郁症的比率更高。FHP的青少年使用精神药物和出现医学问题的频率也更高。此外,FHP的青少年报告称大麻和酒精的使用频率更高,自杀意念和创伤发生率也更高。尽管如此,在分析前的六个月内,只有4%的FHP青少年前往MGB的精神科或心理科就诊。
在一个大型学术医疗系统中,FHP的青少年构成了一个独特且实际可识别的风险队列。家族高风险青少年中精神和医学问题增加,以及更普遍的风险因素,凸显了制定针对性临床项目以实现一级和二级预防的必要性。