Suppr超能文献

用于校正Gafchromic XR-QA2薄膜不均匀性误差的紫外线A背侧照射

Backside Irradiation of Ultraviolet-A for Correcting Nonuniformity Error of Gafchromic XR-QA2 Films.

作者信息

Tanki Nobuyoshi, Goto Sachiko, Katsuda Toshizo, Gotanda Rumi, Gotanda Tatsuhiro, Kuwano Tadao

机构信息

Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Phys. 2024 Oct-Dec;49(4):563-567. doi: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_87_24. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Radiochromic film is used for quality assurance and quality control of X-ray equipment in the diagnostic radiology. In addition, three-dimensional dose distribution of computed tomography (CT) is measured. To correct the nonuniformity and uncertainty of radiochromic films for dose measurement of CT, the films are preirradiated ultraviolet (UV)-A rays. There is a difference in the UV protection strength of radiochromic films. A concern exists about the effects of the UV-A irradiation intensity. We thus irradiated with UV-A rays from the backsides of the films to assess if backside irradiation was possible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gafchromic XR-QA2 and RTQA2 were used in this study. The UV-A rays were simultaneously irradiated on the front and backsides of each film for 12 h. The yellow layer of each film was scanned and imaged. The average pixel values ± standard deviations (SDs) were compared. In the statistical analysis, a paired t-test was performed. To compare, the active-layer densities engendered by the UV-A rays. Calibration curve was created with 48 h of preirradiation of UV-A.

RESULTS

The mean pixel values ± SD for Gafchromic XR-QA2 on the front and backsides were 130.776 ± 0.812 and 81.015 ± 1.128, respectively. On the other hand, the mean pixel values ± SD for Gafchromic RTQA2 on the front and backsides were 62.299 ± 1.077 and 133.761 ± 1.365, respectively. The statistical results of the paired t-test were significantly different (P < 0.01) between both films. Fitting equation of the calibration curve is shown below. y = -390.47 ± 200 + (443.45 ± 10x80).5068 ± 0.0434.

CONCLUSION

Based on the relationship between the sensitivity of the active layer to UV-A rays and the strength of UV protection on the surface, we concluded that backside irradiation is recommended for Gafchromic XR-QA2, and frontside irradiation is recommended for Gafchromic RTQA2.

摘要

目的

放射变色薄膜用于诊断放射学中X射线设备的质量保证和质量控制。此外,还用于测量计算机断层扫描(CT)的三维剂量分布。为校正放射变色薄膜在CT剂量测量中的不均匀性和不确定性,对薄膜进行紫外线(UV)-A预辐照。不同放射变色薄膜的紫外线防护强度存在差异。人们担心UV-A辐照强度的影响。因此,我们从薄膜背面进行UV-A辐照,以评估背面辐照是否可行。

材料与方法

本研究使用了Gafchromic XR-QA2和RTQA2。对每张薄膜的正面和背面同时进行12小时的UV-A辐照。对每张薄膜的黄色层进行扫描成像。比较平均像素值±标准差(SD)。在统计分析中,进行配对t检验。为作比较,测定UV-A辐照产生的活性层密度。通过对UV-A进行48小时预辐照建立校准曲线。

结果

Gafchromic XR-QA2正面和背面的平均像素值±SD分别为130.776±0.812和81.015±1.128。另一方面,Gafchromic RTQA2正面和背面的平均像素值±SD分别为62.299±1.077和133.761±1.365。两种薄膜配对t检验的统计结果差异显著(P<0.01)。校准曲线的拟合方程如下。y = -390.47±200 + (443.45±10x80).5068±0.0434。

结论

基于活性层对UV-A射线的敏感性与表面紫外线防护强度之间的关系,我们得出结论,Gafchromic XR-QA2建议采用背面辐照,Gafchromic RTQA2建议采用正面辐照。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bba/11801077/3e6a48d57150/JMP-49-563-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验