Annamalaisamy Selvakumar, Malthesh B S, Shashikumar G M, Shantharam Sreedhara, Kumar P Kiran
Department of Dentistry, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Department of Orthodontics, Subbaiah Institute of Dental Sciences, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3790-S3792. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_993_24. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
Orthodontic therapy is often used to cure dental malocclusions; however, since orthodontic equipment is difficult to keep clean, it might have an adverse effect on periodontal health. Clear aligners and fixed braces are two common orthodontic treatments.
In this research, 100 patients receiving orthodontic treatment at a dental clinic ranged in age from 18 to 35. Two sets of patients were created: 50 with transparent aligners and 50 with fixed braces. At baseline, three months, and six months, periodontal health was evaluated using the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and probing depth (PD). Both groups received advice on oral hygiene. SPSS software was used for data analysis, with a significance level of < 0.05 for statistical analysis.
PI, GI, and PD did not vary significantly between the two groups at baseline ( > 0.05). PI (2.3 ± 0.4) and GI (1.8 ± 0.3) in the fixed braces group were significantly higher after three months than in the clear aligners group (PI: 1.5 ± 0.3, GI: 1.2 ± 0.2, < 0.05). At six months, the group using fixed braces had a substantially higher PD (3.5 ± 0.5 mm) than the group wearing transparent aligners (2.8 ± 0.4 mm, < 0.05). Throughout the course of the trial, the group using transparent aligners had greater periodontal health.
In comparison with patients wearing fixed braces, individuals using transparent aligners showed improved periodontal health, as seen by decreased levels of plaque buildup, gingival inflammation, and probing depth. For individuals who are worried about their periodontal health while undergoing orthodontic treatment, clear aligners could be a better choice.
正畸治疗常用于矫正牙列不齐;然而,由于正畸设备难以保持清洁,可能会对牙周健康产生不利影响。透明矫治器和固定矫治器是两种常见的正畸治疗方法。
本研究中,100名在牙科诊所接受正畸治疗的患者年龄在18至35岁之间。将患者分为两组:50名使用透明矫治器,50名使用固定矫治器。在基线、三个月和六个月时,使用菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和探诊深度(PD)评估牙周健康状况。两组均接受了口腔卫生指导。使用SPSS软件进行数据分析,统计分析的显著性水平为<0.05。
两组在基线时PI、GI和PD无显著差异(>0.05)。三个月后,固定矫治器组的PI(2.3±0.4)和GI(1.8±0.3)显著高于透明矫治器组(PI:1.5±0.3,GI:1.2±0.2,<0.05)。六个月时,使用固定矫治器组的PD(3.5±0.5mm)显著高于佩戴透明矫治器组(2.8±0.4mm,<0.05)。在整个试验过程中,使用透明矫治器组的牙周健康状况更好。
与佩戴固定矫治器的患者相比,使用透明矫治器的个体牙周健康状况有所改善,表现为菌斑堆积、牙龈炎症和探诊深度水平降低。对于在正畸治疗期间担心牙周健康的个体,透明矫治器可能是更好的选择。