• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于探索性研究验证新抗癌药物在监管批准后的临床益处。

Verifying Clinical Benefit of New Anticancer Drugs After Regulatory Approval Based on Exploratory Studies.

作者信息

Ito Akira, Narukawa Mamoru

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, 5-9-1, Shirokane, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Daiichi Sankyo, Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 May;59(3):542-548. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00757-3. Epub 2025 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-025-00757-3
PMID:39928237
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Japan, anticancer drugs are often approved based on the objective response rate (ORR) when the conduct of a confirmatory study is difficult or expected to take a considerably long time. However, it remains unclear how frequently post-marketing confirmatory studies are conducted and for which indications they are implemented. We aimed to understand the status of post-marketing confirmatory studies for anticancer drugs approved based on ORR.

METHODS

We investigated the status of post-marketing confirmatory studies on anticancer drug indications approved based on ORR in Japan between 2015 and 2022. In addition, we compared the status of post-marketing requirements and subsequent regulatory actions between Japan and the US for the indications commonly approved in both countries.

RESULTS

We found that 60% of the indications did not have planned confirmatory studies, with many receiving orphan drug designations. This observation is consistent with the Japanese regulations that allow the approval of anticancer drugs based on ORR, for which confirmatory studies are difficult to conduct or expected to take a long time. Indications received conditional approval in Japan were fewer compared to those received accelerated approval in the US, and post-marketing confirmatory studies were less frequently requested from the regulatory authority in Japan. Although the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies were often utilized in regulatory actions in Japan (including modifications to approved indications), no indications were found where these results led to withdrawal of approval or additional confirmatory study requirements, and the evaluations of the results were not disclosed when they did not lead to regulatory actions.

CONCLUSIONS

To facilitate smoother regulatory actions based on the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies, it would be beneficial to require the submission of the results of post-marketing confirmatory studies if it is feasible following the approval based on ORR.

摘要

背景

在日本,当确证性研究难以开展或预计耗时很长时,抗癌药物通常根据客观缓解率(ORR)获得批准。然而,目前尚不清楚上市后确证性研究的开展频率以及针对哪些适应症开展此类研究。我们旨在了解基于ORR获批的抗癌药物的上市后确证性研究情况。

方法

我们调查了2015年至2022年期间日本基于ORR获批的抗癌药物适应症的上市后确证性研究情况。此外,我们比较了日本和美国在两国共同获批适应症方面的上市后要求及后续监管行动情况。

结果

我们发现60%的适应症没有计划开展确证性研究,其中许多获得了孤儿药认定。这一观察结果与日本允许基于ORR批准抗癌药物的法规一致,对于此类药物,确证性研究难以开展或预计耗时很长。与在美国获得加速批准的适应症相比,在日本获得有条件批准的适应症较少,并且日本监管机构对上市后确证性研究的要求也较少。尽管上市后确证性研究的结果在日本的监管行动中经常被采用(包括对获批适应症的修改),但未发现这些结果导致批准撤销或额外确证性研究要求的适应症,并且当结果未导致监管行动时,其评估结果未被披露。

结论

为了便于基于上市后确证性研究结果进行更顺畅的监管行动,如果在基于ORR批准后可行的话,要求提交上市后确证性研究结果将是有益的。

相似文献

1
Verifying Clinical Benefit of New Anticancer Drugs After Regulatory Approval Based on Exploratory Studies.基于探索性研究验证新抗癌药物在监管批准后的临床益处。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 May;59(3):542-548. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00757-3. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
A decade of marketing approval of gene and cell-based therapies in the United States, European Union and Japan: An evaluation of regulatory decision-making.美国、欧盟和日本基因和细胞治疗药物上市批准十年来的监管决策评估
Cytotherapy. 2018 Jun;20(6):769-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.03.038. Epub 2018 May 2.
3
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Characteristics of Clinical Trials for the US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval and Subsequent Confirmatory Trials: Implications for Drug Approval in Japan.美国食品和药物管理局加速批准临床试验和后续确证性临床试验的特征:对日本药物批准的影响。
Biol Pharm Bull. 2024;47(7):1345-1349. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b24-00324.
5
Characteristics of Preapproval and Postapproval Studies for Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration.美国食品药品监督管理局批准加速批准的药物的批准前和批准后研究特征。
JAMA. 2017 Aug 15;318(7):626-636. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9415.
6
Impact of the US Accelerated Approval for New Anticancer Drugs on Time to Verification of Benefit and Regulatory Approval in the EU and Japan.美国加速批准新抗癌药物对欧盟和日本获益验证和监管批准时间的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):136-142. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00577-3. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
7
US FDA-accelerated approvals and subsequent withdrawals: influence on Japanese clinical oncology practice guidelines.美国食品药品监督管理局加速批准及后续撤回:对日本临床肿瘤学实践指南的影响
Invest New Drugs. 2025 Apr;43(2):311-317. doi: 10.1007/s10637-025-01524-9. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
8
Unique characteristics of regulatory approval and pivotal studies of orphan anticancer drugs in Japan.日本孤儿抗癌药物监管审批的独特特点和关键研究。
Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug;36(4):702-708. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0603-z. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
9
Post-marketing surveillance framework of cell and gene therapy products in the European Union, the United States, Japan, South Korea and China: a comparative study.细胞和基因治疗产品在欧盟、美国、日本、韩国和中国的上市后监测框架:比较研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 27;22(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03637-z.
10
Continued cancer drug approvals in Japan and Europe after market withdrawal in the United States: A comparative study of accelerated approvals.美国市场撤市后日本和欧洲继续批准抗癌药物:加速批准的比较研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13879. doi: 10.1111/cts.13879.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the US Accelerated Approval for New Anticancer Drugs on Time to Verification of Benefit and Regulatory Approval in the EU and Japan.美国加速批准新抗癌药物对欧盟和日本获益验证和监管批准时间的影响。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):136-142. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00577-3. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
Conditional early approval for new drug applications in Japan: Current and emerging issues.日本新药申请的有条件早期批准:当前及新出现的问题
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug;16(8):1289-1293. doi: 10.1111/cts.13536. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
The On- and Off-Ramps of Oncology Accelerated Approval.
肿瘤学加速批准的“入口匝道”与“出口匝道”
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 20;387(16):1439-1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2208954. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
"Dangling" Accelerated Approvals in Oncology.肿瘤学中的“悬空”加速批准
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):e68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2104846. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Efficacy evaluation of anticancer agents in single-arm clinical trials: analysis of review reports from Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency.单臂临床试验中抗癌药物的疗效评估:日本药品和医疗器械管理局审评报告分析
Acta Oncol. 2021 Feb;60(2):143-148. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1871946. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.加速批准的癌症药物的临床获益评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):906-913. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462.