Suppr超能文献

新辅助免疫化疗对比化疗在局部晚期胃癌中疗效更优的潜在免疫微环境特征

Immune microenvironment features underlying the superior efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy over chemotherapy in local advanced gastric cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Ning, Li Chunyu, Zhao Zehua, Jiang Biying, Wang Wentao, Sun Fujing, Zhang Yong, Zhu Yanmei

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University), Shenyang, China.

Department of Gastric Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University), Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Jan 27;16:1497004. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1497004. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (Io+Chemo) is superior than chemotherapy alone (Chemo). However, the mechanism of Io+Chemo superiority remains to be further elucidated.

METHODS

The study included 128 patients with resectable stage II-III gastric cancer, in which 63 were given neoadjuvant Io+Chemo, and 65 Chemo alone. Patients given Io+Chemo were treated with 2-4 cycles of PD-(L)1 inhibitor (Pembrolizumab, Sintililimab or Nivolumab) with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) before surgical resection. Patients given Chemo were treated with 2-4 cycles of SOX or XELOX before surgical resection. Tumor tissues were evaluated for tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) using immunohistochemistry and QuPath software quantitative analysis, for detecting T, B, NK, plasma cells, and macrophages. The relationship between TIICs and different neoadjuvant treatment regimens and pathological responses was also explored.

RESULTS

Compared with Chemo, Io+Chemo induced higher rates of pathological complete response (33.3 vs. 9.2%, p=0.001) and major pathological response (MPR) (49.2 vs. 30.8%, p=0.033). Compared with Chemo group, density of CD4(1904.8 vs. 1530), CD8(1982.9 vs. 1124.4), CD20(1115.6 vs. 574), CD38(1580.4 vs. 1128), CD138(1237.2 vs. 496.4), and CD56 (596.8 vs. 159) cells was increased 24.5%, 76.4%, 94.4%, 40.1%, and 149.2% respectively, whereas CD163 macrophages (994.4 vs. 1706) was decreased 41.7% in Io+Chemo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study favors neoadjuvant Io+Chemo over Chemo and reveals Io+Chemo can induce the formation of an immune-activated microenvironment that make Io+Chemo superior to Chemo.

摘要

背景

新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗(Io+Chemo)的治疗效果优于单纯化疗(Chemo)。然而,Io+Chemo优势的机制仍有待进一步阐明。

方法

该研究纳入了128例可切除的II-III期胃癌患者,其中63例接受新辅助Io+Chemo,65例接受单纯化疗。接受Io+Chemo的患者在手术切除前接受2-4周期的PD-(L)1抑制剂(帕博利珠单抗、信迪利单抗或纳武利尤单抗)联合S-1和奥沙利铂(SOX)或卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(XELOX)治疗。接受单纯化疗的患者在手术切除前接受2-4周期的SOX或XELOX治疗。使用免疫组织化学和QuPath软件定量分析评估肿瘤组织中的肿瘤浸润免疫细胞(TIICs),以检测T细胞、B细胞、NK细胞、浆细胞和巨噬细胞。还探讨了TIICs与不同新辅助治疗方案及病理反应之间的关系。

结果

与单纯化疗相比,Io+Chemo诱导的病理完全缓解率(33.3%对9.2%,p=0.001)和主要病理反应(MPR)率(49.2%对30.8%,p=0.033)更高。与单纯化疗组相比,Io+Chemo组中CD4(1904.8对1530)、CD8(1982.9对1124.4)、CD20(1115.6对574)、CD38(1580.4对1128)、CD138(1237.2对496.4)和CD56(596.8对159)细胞的密度分别增加了24.5%、76.4%、94.4%、40.1%和149.2%,而CD163巨噬细胞(994.4对1706)减少了41.7%。

结论

我们的研究支持新辅助Io+Chemo优于单纯化疗,并揭示Io+Chemo可诱导形成免疫激活的微环境,这使得Io+Chemo优于单纯化疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0261/11808021/eb906d4164d5/fimmu-16-1497004-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验