Verma Shailja, Reis Ines, Potdar Neelam
Specialty Trainee Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Consultant Gynecology, University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):101-107. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16187. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
Cervical endometriosis (CE) is an uncommon diagnosis with a paucity of evidence on its management.
To examine 10 years of data to identify CE cases and to conduct a systematic review to evaluate evidence for managing CE.
Cases of CE were obtained retrospectively via a pathology coding system. Literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (1949-2022).
Studies on diagnoses and management of CE were included, and those with retrospective diagnosis of CE on histology and no further management were excluded.
An Excel spreadsheet was used for data collection. Two independent authors went through individual cases, extracting and analyzing data.
In case series, women presented with intermenstrual bleeding (IMB)/post-coital bleeding (PCB) n-25, (30%), followed by abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) n-24, (29%), dysmenorrhea n-12, 12%, and/or dyspareunia (12%). In all, 44% had an initial cervical biopsy confirming CE diagnosis and 48% had CE on hysterectomy specimen. Main reasons for hysterectomy were AUB (36%) and fibroids/adenomyosis (28%). In the systematic review, 1737 studies were identified from databases, 181 were assessed for eligibility, and 14 studies discussed individual case reports and case series specifically on treating CE. Nine full-text and abstract studies were available to identify potential treatment options for CE. Treatments were based predominantly on presentation at time of diagnosis.
Findings from case series suggest that CE was the main diagnosis in women who had a hysterectomy for AUB or had a cervical biopsy for PCB/IMB. Investigations should be considered to rule out CE to have the potential for conservative alternative treatment rather than major surgery. There is no clear guidance on managing CE and good-quality studies are required to provide conclusive treatment options.
宫颈子宫内膜异位症(CE)是一种罕见的诊断,关于其治疗的证据很少。
检查10年的数据以识别CE病例,并进行系统评价以评估CE治疗的证据。
通过病理编码系统回顾性获取CE病例。使用Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆(1949 - 2022年)进行文献检索。
纳入关于CE诊断和治疗的研究,排除那些组织学上回顾性诊断为CE且未进一步治疗的研究。
使用Excel电子表格进行数据收集。两名独立作者查阅各个病例,提取并分析数据。
在病例系列中,女性出现经间期出血(IMB)/性交后出血(PCB)的有25例(30%),其次是异常子宫出血(AUB)24例(29%),痛经12例(12%),和/或性交困难(12%)。总体而言,44%的患者最初经宫颈活检确诊为CE,48%的患者子宫切除标本中有CE。子宫切除的主要原因是AUB(36%)和肌瘤/子宫腺肌病(28%)。在系统评价中,从数据库中识别出1737项研究,181项评估其 eligibility,14项研究专门讨论了治疗CE的个案报告和病例系列。有9项全文和摘要研究可用于确定CE的潜在治疗选择。治疗主要基于诊断时的表现。
病例系列的结果表明,CE是因AUB接受子宫切除术或因PCB/IMB接受宫颈活检的女性的主要诊断。应考虑进行检查以排除CE,以便有可能采用保守替代治疗而非大手术。关于CE的治疗尚无明确指导,需要高质量的研究来提供确凿的治疗选择。