Godish T
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1985 Mar;46(3):105-10. doi: 10.1080/15298668591394509.
The usefulness of test results in assessing the health hazard potential of residential formaldehyde exposures depends in great measure on the accuracy and reliability of sampling/analysis methods employed, the protocol used in collecting samples, sampling objectives, and an understanding of residential formaldehyde dynamics and their relationship to environmental variables. Active sampling and analysis methods including detector tubes, the impinger/chromotropic acid method, the impinger/pararosaniline method, and the CEA continuous monitor are reviewed as to advantages and limitations for residential sampling. Passive dosimeter methods including the Dupont Pro-Tec Badge, 3M Monitor, Air Quality Research, Inc. Passive Formaldehyde Kit, and Envirotech, Inc. Dosimeter are also reviewed. Sampling considerations for one-time formaldehyde sampling using the impinger/chromotropic acid method are discussed in detail, including pre-sampling closure of residences, maintenance of a standard indoor temperature both before and during sampling, the undesirability of sampling during cold, dry winter weather, sample number, sampling location, height and duration, environmental measurements during sampling, source identification and sample storage. A model formaldehyde sampling protocol based on the impinger/chromotropic acid method is described.
