• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of Mortality Data Sources Compared to the National Death Index in the Healthcare Integrated Research Database.医疗综合研究数据库中与国家死亡索引相比的死亡率数据源验证
Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Feb 7;16:19-25. doi: 10.2147/POR.S498221. eCollection 2025.
2
Trends in the Completeness and Validity of Sources of Death Data Against the National Death Index From 2010 to 2018.2010 年至 2018 年期间,死亡数据来源的完整性和有效性趋势与国家死亡索引相比。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;33(8):e5870. doi: 10.1002/pds.5870.
3
Comparing the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) enrollment data death dates to the National Death Index (NDI).将医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的参保数据死亡日期与国家死亡索引(NDI)进行比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Mar;33(3):e5772. doi: 10.1002/pds.5772.
4
The impact on National Death Index ascertainment of limiting submissions to Social Security Administration Death Master File matches in epidemiologic studies of mortality.在死亡率流行病学研究中,限制向社会保障管理局死亡主文件匹配系统提交数据对国家死亡指数确定的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 1;169(7):901-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn404. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Evaluation of California Non-Comprehensive Death File Against National Death Index.加利福尼亚州非全面死亡档案与国家死亡索引的评估。
Dialogues Health. 2022 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100015. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
Validation of US CDC National Death Index mortality data, focusing on differences in race and ethnicity.验证美国疾病控制与预防中心国家死亡指数死亡率数据,重点关注种族和民族差异。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jul;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100737.
7
Validation analysis of a composite real-world mortality endpoint for patients with cancer in the United States.美国癌症患者复合真实世界死亡率终点的验证分析。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13669. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Validation of a Composite Real-World Mortality Variable Among Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Treated in the United States.美国接受治疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者综合真实世界死亡率变量的验证
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Apr;9:e2400233. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00233. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
9
Evaluation of a methodology to validate National Death Index retrieval results among a cohort of U.S. service members.评估一种方法,以验证美国军人队列中全国死亡索引检索结果的有效性。
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):397-400. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Accuracy and completeness of mortality data in the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部死亡率数据的准确性和完整性。
Popul Health Metr. 2006 Apr 10;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-4-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Among Medicare Beneficiaries: The Impact of Frailty and Social Vulnerability.医疗保险受益人群经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局:衰弱和社会脆弱性的影响
Struct Heart. 2025 Jun 24;9(8):100685. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100685. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Real-World Retrospective Study of Clinical and Economic Outcomes Among Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapies in the United States: Results from the IMPACT UC-III Study.美国一线全身抗癌治疗的局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者临床和经济结局的真实世界回顾性研究:IMPACT UC-III研究结果
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jul 2;32(7):384. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32070384.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the Completeness and Validity of Sources of Death Data Against the National Death Index From 2010 to 2018.2010 年至 2018 年期间,死亡数据来源的完整性和有效性趋势与国家死亡索引相比。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;33(8):e5870. doi: 10.1002/pds.5870.
2
Categorization of COVID-19 severity to determine mortality risk.COVID-19 严重程度分类以确定死亡风险。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):721-728. doi: 10.1002/pds.5436. Epub 2022 May 9.
3
Validation of a Mortality Composite Score in the Real-World Setting: Overcoming Source-Specific Disparities and Biases.真实环境下死亡率综合评分的验证:克服来源特异性差异和偏倚。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Apr;5:401-413. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00143.
4
Using newspaper obituaries to "nowcast" daily mortality: Evidence from the Italian COVID-19 hot-spots.利用报纸讣告“即时预测”每日死亡率:来自意大利新冠疫情热点地区的证据。
Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):535-540. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
5
Validating the Matching of Patients in the Linkage of a Large Hospital System's EHR with State and National Death Databases.验证大型医院系统的电子健康记录与州和国家死亡数据库的患者匹配。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):82-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722220. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm for predicting the risk of postpartum depression among pregnant women.开发和验证一种机器学习算法,以预测孕妇产后抑郁症的风险。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 15;279:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.113. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
QuickStats: Percentage of Deaths,* by Place of Death - National Vital Statistics System, United States, 2000-2018.快速统计:按死亡地点划分的死亡百分比* - 美国国家生命统计系统,2000 - 2018年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 15;69(19):611. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919a4.
8
Evaluation of Mortality Data From the Social Security Administration Death Master File for Clinical Research.利用社会安全管理局死亡主档案评估临床研究中的死亡率数据。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;4(4):375-379. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0198.
9
Alive or dead: Validity of the Social Security Administration Death Master File after 2011.存活或死亡:2011 年后社会安全管理局死亡主档案的有效性。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54(1):24-33. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13069. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.敏感性、特异性和预测值:研究与实践中的基础、灵活性及陷阱
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00307. eCollection 2017.

医疗综合研究数据库中与国家死亡索引相比的死亡率数据源验证

Validation of Mortality Data Sources Compared to the National Death Index in the Healthcare Integrated Research Database.

作者信息

Jamal-Allial Aziza, Sponholtz Todd, Vojjala Shiva K, Paullin Mark, Papazian Anahit, Eshete Biruk, Mahmoudpour Seyed Hamidreza, Verpillat Patrice, Beachler Daniel C

机构信息

Safety & Epidemiology, Carelon Research, Newton, MA, USA.

Safety & Epidemiology, Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.

出版信息

Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Feb 7;16:19-25. doi: 10.2147/POR.S498221. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/POR.S498221
PMID:39936035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11812554/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Death Index (NDI) is the gold standard for mortality data in the United States (US) but has a time lag and can be operationally intensive. This validation study assesses the accuracy of various mortality data sources with the NDI.

METHODS

This validation study is a secondary analysis of an advanced cancer cohort in the US between January 2010 and December 2018, with an established NDI linkage. Mortality data sources, inpatient discharge, disenrollment, death master file (DMF), Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Utilization management data (U.M.), and online obituary data were compared to NDI.

RESULTS

Among 40,692 patients, 25,761 (63.3%) had a death date using NDI; the composite algorithm had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI = 88.5%, 89.3%), specificity was 89.1% (95% CI = 88.6%, 89.6%). At the same time, positive predictive value (PPV) was 93.4% (95% CI = 93.1%, 93.7%), negative predictive value (NPV) was 82.3% (95% CI = 81.7%, 82.9%), and when comparing each individual source, each had a high PPV but limited sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The composite algorithm was demonstrated to be a sensitive and precise measure of mortality, while individual database sources were accurate but had limited sensitivity.

摘要

背景

美国国家死亡指数(NDI)是美国死亡率数据的金标准,但存在时间滞后且操作可能较为繁琐。本验证研究评估了各种死亡率数据源与NDI的准确性。

方法

本验证研究是对2010年1月至2018年12月期间美国一个晚期癌症队列的二次分析,已建立NDI链接。将死亡率数据源、住院出院、退保、死亡主文件(DMF)、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)、利用管理数据(U.M.)以及在线讣告数据与NDI进行比较。

结果

在40,692名患者中,25,761名(63.3%)使用NDI确定了死亡日期;综合算法的灵敏度为88.9%(95%置信区间 = 88.5%,89.3%),特异度为89.1%(95%置信区间 = 88.6%,89.6%)。同时,阳性预测值(PPV)为93.4%(95%置信区间 = 93.1%,93.7%),阴性预测值(NPV)为82.3%(95%置信区间 = 81.7%,82.9%),并且在比较每个单独的数据源时,每个数据源的PPV都很高,但灵敏度有限。

结论

综合算法被证明是一种敏感且精确的死亡率测量方法,而单个数据库来源准确但灵敏度有限。