Chudoung Ubon, Saengon Wilaipon, Peonim Vichan, Worasuwannarak Wisarn
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama VI Road, Thung Phaya Thai, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand, 66 2201-1145.
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Feb 10;11:e57634. doi: 10.2196/57634.
Forensic medicine requires background medical knowledge and the ability to apply it to legal cases. Medical students have different levels of medical knowledge and are therefore likely to perform differently when learning forensic medicine. However, different medical curricula in Thailand deliver forensic medicine courses at different stages of medical study; most curricula deliver these courses in the clinical years, while others offer them in the preclinical years. This raises questions about the differences in learning effectiveness.
We aimed to compare the learning outcomes of medical students in curricula that either teach forensic medicine at the clinical level or teach it at the preclinical level.
This was a 5-year retrospective study that compared multiple-choice question (MCQ) scores in a forensic medicine course for fifth- and third-year medical students. The fifth-year students' program was different from that of the third-year students, but both programs were offered by Mahidol University. The students were taught forensic medicine by the same instructors, used similar content, and were evaluated via examinations of similar difficulty. Of the 1063 medical students included in this study, 782 were fifth-year clinical students, and 281 were third-year preclinical students.
The average scores of the fifth- and third-year medical students were 76.09% (SD 6.75%) and 62.94% (SD 8.33%), respectively. The difference was statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis test: P<.001). Additionally, the average score of fifth-year medical students was significantly higher than that of third-year students in every academic year (all P values were <.001).
Teaching forensic medicine during the preclinical years may be too early, and preclinical students may not understand the clinical content sufficiently. Attention should be paid to ensuring that students have the adequate clinical background before teaching subjects that require clinical applications, especially in forensic medicine.
法医学需要医学背景知识以及将其应用于法律案件的能力。医学生的医学知识水平各不相同,因此在学习法医学时可能表现各异。然而,泰国不同的医学课程在医学学习的不同阶段开设法医学课程;大多数课程在临床阶段开设这些课程,而其他课程则在临床前阶段提供。这引发了关于学习效果差异的问题。
我们旨在比较在临床阶段教授法医学的课程和在临床前阶段教授法医学的课程中,医学生的学习成果。
这是一项为期5年的回顾性研究,比较了五年级和三年级医学生在法医学课程中的多项选择题(MCQ)成绩。五年级学生的课程与三年级学生不同,但两个课程均由玛希隆大学提供。学生由相同的教师教授法医学,使用相似的内容,并通过难度相似的考试进行评估。本研究纳入的1063名医学生中,782名是五年级临床学生,281名是三年级临床前学生。
五年级和三年级医学生的平均成绩分别为76.09%(标准差6.75%)和62.94%(标准差8.33%)。差异具有统计学意义(Kruskal-Wallis检验:P<.001)。此外,五年级医学生在每个学年的平均成绩均显著高于三年级学生(所有P值均<.001)。
在临床前阶段教授法医学可能为时过早,临床前学生可能对临床内容理解不够充分。在教授需要临床应用的科目时,应注意确保学生具备足够的临床背景,尤其是在法医学方面。