Suppr超能文献

老化及聚合后效应对添加剂夹板材料转化率和性能的影响

Aging and post-polymerization effects on conversion degree and properties of additive splint materials.

作者信息

Santis Leandro Ruivo de, Fernandes Lucas Silveira, Vasques Mayra Torres, Zambrana Nataly Rabelo Mina, Viana Ítallo Emídio Lira, Forlin Taís Scaramucci, Saavedra Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni, Francci Carlos Eduardo

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo - USP, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetics, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Private practice, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2025 Feb 7;39:e017. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.017. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The study objective was to analyze dimensional change, flexural strength, surface hardness, wear profile, and conversion degree of different additive splint materials under various post-polymerization conditions of time and artificial aging. Two additive manufacturing systems (Cara Print 4.0, Dima Print Ortho, Kulzer; SprintRay Pro, SprintRay Splint, SprintRay), and a thermally activated resin control (Clássico) were evaluated in artificial aging (deionized water or saliva; 28 or 84 days at 37°C), with recommended or doubled post-polymerization cycles. Dimensional change (surface metrology), flexural strength (ISO 20795-1:2013), fractography (SEM), Knoop hardness, two-body wear profilometry (150,000 cycles; 3mmØ; 20N; 2.1Hz), and conversion degree (FTIR spectroscopy) were assessed. Two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests were used for parametric data, and Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc Dunn tests, for non-parametric data (α = 0.05). Results indicated no statistically significant differences in dimensional change or flexural strength among the materials. Recommended post-polymerization cycles resulted in lower hardness for additive resins than the thermally activated control. Doubling post-polymerization time significantly increased flexural strength and hardness of Dima Print Ortho, but decreased flexural strength of SprintRay Splint, and did not affect wear resistance. Dima Print Ortho demonstrated the highest wear resistance. Artificial aging did not affect flexural strength, surface wear, or dimensional change, but negatively impacted the hardness of all materials except Dima Print Ortho. The conversion degree was unaffected by post-polymerization time, and no significant differences were found among the materials. Overall, additive materials exhibited mechanical and dimensional properties comparable to thermally activated resin, with doubling post-polymerization time positively influencing the properties.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析不同添加剂夹板材料在不同聚合后时间条件和人工老化下的尺寸变化、弯曲强度、表面硬度、磨损情况及转化率。评估了两种添加剂制造系统(Cara Print 4.0、Dima Print Ortho,库尔泽公司;SprintRay Pro、SprintRay Splint、SprintRay)以及一种热固化树脂对照品(Clássico)在人工老化(去离子水或唾液;37°C下28天或84天)条件下,采用推荐的或双倍的聚合后循环次数的情况。评估了尺寸变化(表面计量学)、弯曲强度(ISO 20795-1:2013)、断口分析(扫描电子显微镜)、努氏硬度、两体磨损轮廓测定法(150,000次循环;3mm直径;20N;2.1Hz)以及转化率(傅里叶变换红外光谱法)。对于参数数据,使用双向方差分析和事后Tukey检验;对于非参数数据,使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和事后Dunn检验(α = 0.05)。结果表明,材料之间在尺寸变化或弯曲强度方面无统计学显著差异。推荐的聚合后循环次数导致添加剂树脂的硬度低于热固化对照品。将聚合后时间加倍显著提高了Dima Print Ortho的弯曲强度和硬度,但降低了SprintRay Splint的弯曲强度,且不影响耐磨性。Dima Print Ortho表现出最高的耐磨性。人工老化未影响弯曲强度、表面磨损或尺寸变化,但对除Dima Print Ortho之外的所有材料的硬度有负面影响。转化率不受聚合后时间的影响,且材料之间未发现显著差异。总体而言,添加剂材料表现出与热固化树脂相当的机械性能和尺寸性能,聚合后时间加倍对性能有积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/11808695/342f92986fa3/1807-3107-bor-39-e017-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Aging and post-polymerization effects on conversion degree and properties of additive splint materials.
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Feb 7;39:e017. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.017. eCollection 2025.
3
Influence of prolonged heating protocols on the physico-mechanical properties of resin composites.
Quintessence Int. 2025 Jun 20;56(6):442-448. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b6156608.
5
Effect of cavity depth on degree of conversion and microhardness of low-shrinkage resin composites.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):1091. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06511-3.
7
Impact of aging on the mechanical and structural properties of additively manufactured resin for occlusal devices.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):222.e1-222.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.031. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
8
Laboratory mechanical parameters of composite resins and their relation to fractures and wear in clinical trials-A systematic review.
Dent Mater. 2017 Mar;33(3):e101-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Materials and manufacturing techniques for occlusal splints: A literature review.
J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Nov;50(11):1348-1354. doi: 10.1111/joor.13550. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Evaluation of the mechanical properties of different materials for manufacturing occlusal splints.
Braz Oral Res. 2023 Apr 28;37:e034. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0034. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessing the physical and mechanical properties of 3D printed acrylic material for denture base application.
Dent Mater. 2022 Dec;38(12):1841-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
5
Wear Behavior of Occlusal Splint Materials Manufactured By Various Methods: A Systematic Review.
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jul;31(6):472-487. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13432. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
Effect of different fabrication methods of occlusal devices on periradicular stress distribution: A photoelastic analysis.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Apr;129(4):651-656. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.037. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
7
3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review.
Dent Mater. 2021 Feb;37(2):336-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.030. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Comparison of hardness and polishability of various occlusal splint materials.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Mar;115:104270. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104270. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
9
Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Mar;115:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104254. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验