Suppr超能文献

同意透析器复用:从伦理角度来看是否必要?

Consent to dialyzer reuse: is it ethically necessary?

作者信息

Kaye M, Lella J, Gagnon R, Low G

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 1985;5(2):138-41. doi: 10.1159/000166920.

Abstract

It is argued that consent by the patient to reuse dialyzers which have been mechanically cleansed is not required provided adequate standards of practice and safety are utilized. Based on medical benefits, administrative order and cost saving we propose that specific informed consent for such reuse should not be mandatory and that it could at times be unhelpful, both to care givers and recipients.

摘要

有人认为,只要采用了适当的操作和安全标准,患者无需同意复用经过机械清洗的透析器。基于医疗益处、行政命令和成本节约,我们建议,对于这种复用,不应强制要求获得特定的知情同意,而且有时这对医护人员和患者都没有帮助。

相似文献

7
National Kidney Foundation report on dialyzer reuse.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1988 Jan;11(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(88)80166-5.
8
Automated reuse of capillary hemodialyzers.
Int J Artif Organs. 1985 Mar;8(2):83-8.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验