Álvarez-Bustos Alejandro, Romero-Elías María, Rosado García Silvia, Méndez-Otero Marta, Cebolla-Boado Héctor, Sánchez-López Antonio José, Navarro Rocio, Ruiz-Casado Ana
Biomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPaz), 28029, Madrid, Spain.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 12;33(3):183. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09233-y.
Physical activity (PA) has been associated with remarkable benefits in breast cancer (BC) survivors. However, the physiological mechanisms that underlie these benefits are not well understood and the published results are inconsistent and weak. Some authors suggest that some biomarkers, particularly those related with inflammation, insulin resistance, or sexual hormones may account for some of these benefits. Most studies have used self-reported tools to assess PA.
To explore the association between objectively assessed PA and potentially related biomarkers.
A cross-sectional study was performed in a single hospital in Madrid, Spain. Candidates were BC survivors older than 18, who had finished their treatments. PA was assessed through accelerometers. Biomarkers related with insulin resistance (glucose, insulin, IGF-1, IGFBP-3), inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), interleukin (IL) 1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF, sexual hormones (progesterone, testosterone, estrogens, androsterone), hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) (cortisol), autonomic nervous system (ANS) (noradrenaline), and oxidative stress (8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, 8-OHdG) were assessed.
Data of 91 women (mean age: 51.4 ± 8.1 years, mean BMI (kg/m): 25.9 ± 4.5) were analyzed. Sedentary time (β (SE): - 0.001 (0.001), p-value 0.040) and vigorous PA time (β (SE): 0.010 (0.004), p-value 0.026) were significantly associated with NLR, but not with other biomarkers.
PA was not associated with biomarkers related to insulin resistance, sexual hormones, HPA, ANS, and oxidative stress. Neither was it associated with typical biomarkers of inflammation. An unexpected but consistent direct association with NLR was found. This relationship deserves further confirmation.
身体活动(PA)已被证明对乳腺癌(BC)幸存者有显著益处。然而,这些益处背后的生理机制尚未完全明确,已发表的研究结果也不一致且说服力不足。一些作者认为,某些生物标志物,特别是那些与炎症、胰岛素抵抗或性激素相关的生物标志物,可能是这些益处的部分原因。大多数研究使用自我报告工具来评估PA。
探讨客观评估的PA与潜在相关生物标志物之间的关联。
在西班牙马德里的一家医院进行了一项横断面研究。研究对象为年龄在18岁以上且已完成治疗的BC幸存者。通过加速度计评估PA。评估了与胰岛素抵抗(葡萄糖、胰岛素、IGF-1、IGFBP-3)、炎症(C反应蛋白(CRP)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、白细胞介素(IL)1、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF))、性激素(孕酮、睾酮、雌激素、雄酮)、下丘脑-垂体轴(HPA)(皮质醇)、自主神经系统(ANS)(去甲肾上腺素)以及氧化应激(8-羟基-2'-脱氧鸟苷,8-OHdG)相关的生物标志物。
分析了91名女性的数据(平均年龄:51.4±8.1岁,平均体重指数(kg/m²):25.9±4.5)。久坐时间(β(标准误):-0.001(0.001),p值0.040)和剧烈PA时间(β(标准误):0.010(0.004),p值0.026)与NLR显著相关,但与其他生物标志物无关。
PA与胰岛素抵抗、性激素、HPA、ANS和氧化应激相关的生物标志物无关。它也与典型的炎症生物标志物无关。发现了与NLR意外但一致的直接关联。这种关系值得进一步证实。