Silveira Stephanie L, Jeng Brenda, Gower Barbara A, Cutter Gary R, Motl Robert W
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 3810 Ridgeway Drive, Birmingham, AL 35209, USA.
Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77493, USA.
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 25;17(3):438. doi: 10.3390/nu17030438.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) are interested in diet as a second-line approach for disease management. This study examined potential variables that correlate with inaccuracy of self-reported energy intake (EI) in adults with MS.
Twenty-eight participants completed two assessment appointments within a 14-day period that included a standard doubly labeled water (DLW) protocol for estimating total energy expenditure (TEE). The participants reported their EI using the Automated Self-Administered 24 h (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool. The primary variables of interest for explaining the discrepancy between TEE and ASA24 EI (i.e., inaccuracy) included cognition (processing speed, visuospatial memory, and verbal memory), hydration status (total body water), and device-measured physical activity. Pearson's correlations assessed the association between absolute and percent inaccuracy in reporting of EI with outcomes of interest, followed by linear regression analyses for identifying independent correlates.
California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) z-scores and light physical activity (LPA) were significantly associated with mean absolute difference in EI ( = -0.53 and = 0.46, respectively). CVLT-II -scores and LPA were the only variables significantly associated with mean percent difference in EI ( = -0.48 and = 0.42, respectively). The regression analyses indicated that both CVLT-II and LPA significantly explained variance in mean absolute difference in EI, and only CVLT-II explained variance for percent difference in EI.
The results from this study indicate that verbal learning and memory and LPA are associated with inaccuracy of self-reported EI in adults with MS. This may guide timely research identifying appropriate protocols for assessment of diet in MS.
背景/目的:多发性硬化症(MS)患者对饮食作为疾病管理的二线方法感兴趣。本研究调查了与成年MS患者自我报告能量摄入(EI)不准确相关的潜在变量。
28名参与者在14天内完成了两次评估预约,其中包括用于估计总能量消耗(TEE)的标准双标记水(DLW)方案。参与者使用自动自我管理的24小时(ASA24)饮食评估工具报告他们的EI。用于解释TEE和ASA24 EI之间差异(即不准确)的主要感兴趣变量包括认知(处理速度、视觉空间记忆和言语记忆)、水合状态(全身水)和设备测量的身体活动。Pearson相关性评估了EI报告中绝对和百分比不准确与感兴趣结果之间的关联,随后进行线性回归分析以确定独立的相关因素。
加利福尼亚言语学习测试第二版(CVLT-II)z分数和轻度身体活动(LPA)与EI的平均绝对差异显著相关(分别为=-0.53和=0.46)。CVLT-II分数和LPA是与EI平均百分比差异显著相关的唯一变量(分别为=-0.48和=0.42)。回归分析表明,CVLT-II和LPA均显著解释了EI平均绝对差异的方差,只有CVLT-II解释了EI百分比差异的方差。
本研究结果表明,言语学习和记忆以及LPA与成年MS患者自我报告EI的不准确相关。这可能指导及时开展研究,确定评估MS患者饮食的适当方案。