Zimmerli Aurelia, Salihu Adil, Antiochos Panagiotis, Lu Henri, Pitta Gros Barbara, Berger Alexandre, Muller Olivier, Meier David, Fournier Stephane
Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 27;14(3):829. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030829.
A considerable number of patients with angina undergo invasive coronary angiography, which might reveal non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). In this setting, they might have coronary microvascular disease (CMD). Its prevalence significantly varies in the literature. This systematic review aims to document the prevalence of CMD over time according to the diagnostic modalities. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase, covering publications from inception to 1 May 2024. Among 1471 identified articles, 297 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. All studies reporting the prevalence of CMD in ANOCA patients based on invasive coronary artery (ICA), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) were included. The review included 53 studies (published between 1998 and 2024), encompassing a total of 16,602 patients. Of these studies, 23 used ICA, 15 used PET-CT, 8 used TTE, and 7 used CMR. A statistically significant increase in CMD prevalence over time was observed across all diagnostic modalities ( < 0.05), except for PET-CT, which showed a consistent and stable prevalence over time. Notably, the prevalence rates from all of the diagnostic methods converged towards the 50% prevalence detected by PET-CT. The prevalence of CMD in patients with ANOCA is subject to debate. However, the current data suggest that regardless of the diagnostic method used, the most recent studies tend to converge towards a prevalence value of 50%, which has been consistently reported by PET-CT from the beginning.
相当数量的心绞痛患者接受了有创冠状动脉造影,这可能显示冠状动脉无阻塞(ANOCA)。在这种情况下,他们可能患有冠状动脉微血管疾病(CMD)。其患病率在文献中有显著差异。本系统评价旨在根据诊断方式记录CMD随时间的患病率。使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase进行了系统的文献综述,涵盖从创刊到2024年5月1日的出版物。在1471篇已识别的文章中,对297篇全文文章进行了资格评估。纳入了所有基于有创冠状动脉(ICA)、正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)、经胸超声心动图(TTE)或心脏磁共振(CMR)报告ANOCA患者中CMD患病率的研究。该综述包括53项研究(发表于1998年至2024年之间),共涉及16602名患者。在这些研究中,23项使用ICA,15项使用PET-CT,8项使用TTE,7项使用CMR。除PET-CT随时间显示患病率一致且稳定外,在所有诊断方式中均观察到CMD患病率随时间有统计学意义的增加(<0.05)。值得注意的是,所有诊断方法的患病率都趋向于PET-CT检测到的50%患病率。ANOCA患者中CMD的患病率存在争议。然而,目前的数据表明无论使用何种诊断方法,最新的研究倾向于趋向于50%的患病率值,这从一开始就一直由PET-CT报告。