• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双层颈动脉支架的使用与患者生存率提高及神经并发症减少相关:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。

Use of Double-Layer Carotid Stents Is Associated with Improved Patient Survival and Lower Neurological Complications: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Mikelis Kipras, Kurminas Marius, Lengvenis Givi, Jančiauskas Radvilas, Misonis Nerijus, Budrys Povilas, Šerpytis Rokas, Berūkštis Andrius

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 29;14(3):888. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030888.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14030888
PMID:39941559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11818721/
Abstract

: Dual-layer stents (DLS) with micromesh technology may offer better protection from plaque protrusion compared to single-layer stents (SLS), but little data are available. The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of elective carotid artery stenting for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients treated for primary CAS with DLS or SLS in a high-volume center. : This study is a single-center retrospective cohort study and included patients who underwent elective CAS between December 2006 and September 2023. The final analysis included patient baseline characteristics, postoperative complications and patient outcomes. : A total of 573 patients underwent elective carotid artery stenting in the study period. Most of the 573 patients undergoing CAS were male (62.5%), and the median age of patients at the time of CAS was 70 years. Of the 573 eligible patients, 43.5% (n = 249) were asymptomatic and 56.4% (n = 323) were symptomatic. Analyzing neurological complications, it was found that the only factor that had a statistically significant effect was the type of stent used. Patients who had a carotid stenting procedure using a single-layer carotid stent had statistically significantly more periprocedural neurological complications (8.3% (n = 35)) than the double-mesh stent group (2% (n = 3)), mostly due to more transient ischemic attacks in the single-layer stent group (4% (n = 17)) compared to the double-mesh group (0.7% (n = 1)). : The use of carotid double-layer stents is associated with a low rate of periprocedural and postprocedural events.

摘要

与单层支架(SLS)相比,采用微网技术的双层支架(DLS)可能能更好地防止斑块突出,但相关数据较少。本研究的目的是比较在一个高容量中心,对无症状和有症状患者进行原发性颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)时,使用DLS或SLS的临床结局。

本研究是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2006年12月至2023年9月期间接受择期CAS的患者。最终分析包括患者基线特征、术后并发症和患者结局。

在研究期间,共有573例患者接受了择期颈动脉支架置入术。接受CAS的573例患者中,大多数为男性(62.5%),CAS时患者的中位年龄为70岁。在573例符合条件的患者中,43.5%(n = 249)无症状,56.4%(n = 323)有症状。分析神经并发症发现,唯一具有统计学显著影响的因素是所使用的支架类型。使用单层颈动脉支架进行颈动脉支架置入术的患者围手术期神经并发症在统计学上显著多于双层网孔支架组(8.3%(n = 35))(2%(n = 3)),主要原因是单层支架组的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)多于双层网孔组(4%(n = 17))(0.7%(n = 1))。

使用颈动脉双层支架与围手术期和术后低事件发生率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/acfe364c2286/jcm-14-00888-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/c831f1067b2f/jcm-14-00888-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/cdaa9b72af26/jcm-14-00888-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/219e1199a756/jcm-14-00888-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/d88b2782c45a/jcm-14-00888-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/efd8dd56e561/jcm-14-00888-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/bedd3ada9bad/jcm-14-00888-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/acfe364c2286/jcm-14-00888-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/c831f1067b2f/jcm-14-00888-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/cdaa9b72af26/jcm-14-00888-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/219e1199a756/jcm-14-00888-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/d88b2782c45a/jcm-14-00888-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/efd8dd56e561/jcm-14-00888-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/bedd3ada9bad/jcm-14-00888-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e784/11818721/acfe364c2286/jcm-14-00888-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Double-Layer Carotid Stents Is Associated with Improved Patient Survival and Lower Neurological Complications: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.双层颈动脉支架的使用与患者生存率提高及神经并发症减少相关:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 29;14(3):888. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030888.
2
Dual- vs single-layer stents for endovascular treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.双层与单层支架用于有症状和无症状颈内动脉狭窄的血管内治疗
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Dec;57:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
Short-Term Double Layer Mesh Stent Patency for Emergent or Elective Carotid Artery Stenting.用于紧急或选择性颈动脉支架置入术的短期双层网眼支架通畅率。
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1898-1901. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024586. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
Contemporary Results of Carotid Artery Stenting Using Low-Profile Dual-Metal Layer Nitinol Micromesh Stents in Relation to Single-Layer Carotid Stents.使用低剖面双层氮钛合金微网支架与单层颈动脉支架治疗颈动脉狭窄的当代结果比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Oct;28(5):726-736. doi: 10.1177/15266028211025046. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Mid-Term Results of an Italian Multicentric Experience with the Roadsaver Dual-Layer Carotid Stent System.意大利多中心使用Roadsaver双层颈动脉支架系统的中期结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;12(1):120. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010120.
6
Radial and ulnar approach for carotid artery stenting with Roadsaver™ double layer micromesh stent: Early and long-term follow-up.使用Roadsaver™双层微网支架经桡动脉和尺动脉途径行颈动脉支架置入术:早期和长期随访
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;101(1):154-163. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30514. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
7
30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study).使用双层微网支架进行现实世界中择期颈动脉狭窄治疗的30天结果(ROADSAVER研究)
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
8
Dual-layered micromesh stent technology for embolic prevention in carotid revascularization: technical experience and clinical outcomes from a high-volume interventional radiology center.双层微网支架技术在颈动脉血运重建中预防栓塞:来自大容量介入放射学中心的技术经验和临床结果。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2024 Jun;65(3):213-220. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.24.13033-9. Epub 2024 May 10.
9
Potential of New-Generation Double-Layer Micromesh Stent for Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Unstable Plaque: A Preliminary Result Using OFDI Analysis.新一代双层微网支架用于不稳定斑块患者颈动脉支架置入术的潜力:使用光学频率域成像分析的初步结果
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.171. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
10
"Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)".“双层微网支架在有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄择期治疗中的真实世界研究(ROADSAVER)”。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03051-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
One-Year Outcomes of CGuard Double Mesh Stent in Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病中 CGuard 双网支架的一年结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 8;60(2):286. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020286.
2
Comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective single-center analysis.比较颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术:回顾性单中心分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Nov;11(11):3409-3416. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-797. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
3
Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
颈动脉支架置入术联合双层支架:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Jun;31(3):339-349. doi: 10.1177/15266028221126940. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
4
Carotid Artery Stenting: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.颈动脉支架置入术:JACC 最新技术评价。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 12;80(2):155-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.05.007.
5
Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2022 Oct;53(10):3047-3054. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.038994. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Management of atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery stenosis.动脉粥样硬化性颅外颈动脉狭窄的管理。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Mar;21(3):273-283. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00359-8.
7
Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions.全球卒中流行病学和急性缺血性卒中干预措施的可及性。
Neurology. 2021 Nov 16;97(20 Suppl 2):S6-S16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.
8
Ischemic Stroke.缺血性中风
Am J Med. 2021 Dec;134(12):1457-1464. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.07.027. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):e3-e5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030521. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.有症状颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 12;9(9):CD001081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001081.pub4.