• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用双层微网支架进行现实世界中择期颈动脉狭窄治疗的30天结果(ROADSAVER研究)

30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study).

作者信息

Langhoff Ralf, Vajda Zsolt, Odrowąż-Pieniążek Piotr, Gjoreski Aleksandar, Beelen Roel, Deloose Koen, Nemes Balázs, Ruzsa Zoltán, Banos Jean-Luc, Castro Sérgio, Faurie Benjamin, Fuß Torsten, Piorkowski Michael, Király Istvan, Vulev Ivan, Schwindt Arne, Csécsei Péter, Tomasello Weitz Alejandro, Jonszta Tomáš, Latacz Paweł, Galván Fernández Jorge, Verbist Jürgen, Schröder Henrik, Pöckler-Schöniger Christiane, Kupcs Karlis, Lozano Vilardell Pascual, Rodríguez Carvajal Rubén, Daenens Kim, Tenholt Matthias, Blaško Peter, François Olivier, Diaz Valiño José Luis, Martínez Gámez Francisco Javier, Sesselmann Volker, Bárzo Pál, Kurre Wiebke, Terceño Izaga Mikel, Orgaz Pérez-Grueso Antonio, Suppan Karol, Lacman Jiří, Larrea Peña José Angel, Blasco Jordi, Bokkers Reinoud, Cvetić Vladimir, Till Viktor, Vallés González Heliodoro, Andrassy Martin, van den Heuvel Daniel, Köhler Jürgen, Müller-Hülsbeck Stefan, Kedev Sasko

机构信息

Department of Angiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Clinic Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel and Sankt Gertrauden - Hospital, Berlin, Germany.

Neurovascular Unit, Moritz Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z
PMID:40107985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11958397/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Carotid artery stenting with single-layer stents carries a risk of periprocedural cerebral embolization compared to carotid endarterectomy. Dual-layer micromesh stents were designed for improved plaque coverage and sustained embolic protection. This analysis aimed to confirm the Roadsaver dual-layer micromesh stent safety in a real-world carotid artery stenting cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ROADSAVER was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, observational study. Patients with carotid artery stenosis, eligible for elective stenting, were enrolled at 52 sites across 13 European countries. All procedures followed standard practice. The primary outcome was the 30-day major adverse event rate, defined as the cumulative incidence of any death or stroke. All deaths, strokes, and carotid artery revascularizations were independently adjudicated.

RESULTS

In total, 1965 patients were analysed (mean age 70.6 ± 8.8 years). Cerebral ischaemia symptoms were present in 49.4% of participants. Radial/ulnar access was used in 26.3% of cases and embolic protection in 63.8%. The 30-day major adverse event incidence was 2.2% (1.6% in asymptomatic and 2.8% in symptomatic patients), with any stroke at 1.9%, any death at 0.8%, and stroke-related death at 0.5%. Predictors of higher 30-day major adverse event risk, identified through multivariable modelling, included residual stenosis ≥ 30%, thromboembolic venous disease, previous myocardial infarction, age ≥ 75 years, family history of atherosclerosis, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and stent length.

CONCLUSION

Dual-layer micromesh carotid artery stenting is safe, with a low 30-day major adverse event incidence in real-world asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, supporting the sustained embolic protection design concept.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2, observational study (with dramatic effect).

摘要

目的

与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,使用单层支架进行颈动脉支架置入术存在围手术期脑栓塞风险。双层微网支架旨在改善斑块覆盖并提供持续的栓子保护。本分析旨在在真实世界的颈动脉支架置入队列中确认Roadsaver双层微网支架的安全性。

材料与方法

Roadsaver是一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心观察性研究。符合择期支架置入条件的颈动脉狭窄患者在13个欧洲国家的52个地点入组。所有手术均遵循标准操作。主要结局是30天主要不良事件发生率,定义为任何死亡或中风的累积发生率。所有死亡、中风和颈动脉血管重建均由独立判定。

结果

共分析了1965例患者(平均年龄70.6±8.8岁)。49.4%的参与者有脑缺血症状。26.3%的病例采用桡动脉/尺动脉入路,63.8%使用栓子保护装置。30天主要不良事件发生率为2.2%(无症状患者为1.6%,有症状患者为2.8%),任何中风发生率为1.9%,任何死亡发生率为0.8%,中风相关死亡率为0.5%。通过多变量建模确定的30天主要不良事件风险较高的预测因素包括残余狭窄≥30%、血栓栓塞性静脉疾病、既往心肌梗死、年龄≥75岁、动脉粥样硬化家族史、非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、有症状的颈动脉狭窄和支架长度。

结论

双层微网颈动脉支架置入术是安全的,在真实世界的无症状和有症状患者中30天主要不良事件发生率较低,支持持续栓子保护的设计理念。

证据水平

2级,观察性研究(有显著效果)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ebc/11958397/61cde82c866c/270_2025_4003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ebc/11958397/b8d67f17437c/270_2025_4003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ebc/11958397/61cde82c866c/270_2025_4003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ebc/11958397/b8d67f17437c/270_2025_4003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ebc/11958397/61cde82c866c/270_2025_4003_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
30-Day Outcomes of Real-World Elective Carotid Stenosis Treatment Using a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent (ROADSAVER Study).使用双层微网支架进行现实世界中择期颈动脉狭窄治疗的30天结果(ROADSAVER研究)
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Apr;48(4):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s00270-025-04003-z. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术联合双层支架:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Jun;31(3):339-349. doi: 10.1177/15266028221126940. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
3
"Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)".“双层微网支架在有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄择期治疗中的真实世界研究(ROADSAVER)”。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03051-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Carotid artery stenting with open vs closed stent cell configurations in the CREST-2 Registry.在CREST-2注册研究中开放与闭合支架网孔结构的颈动脉支架置入术
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):127-135.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.025. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
5
Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内球囊血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub4.
6
Sex differences in outcome after carotid revascularization in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉血运重建术后结局的性别差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;78(3):817-827.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.502. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
7
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.经皮腔内血管成形术及支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub2.
8
Impact of embolic protection methods versus access types on outcomes of carotid artery stenting.栓塞保护方法与入路类型对颈动脉支架置入术结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):146-154.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.02.026. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
9
Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: A network meta-analysis.颈动脉支架置入术中的栓塞保护装置:一项网状荟萃分析。
Vascular. 2024 Apr;32(2):447-457. doi: 10.1177/17085381221140616. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Endarterectomy achieves lower stroke and death rates compared with stenting in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,与支架置入术相比,动脉内膜切除术可降低中风和死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):607-617. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.053.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary carotid artery stenting practices and peri-procedural outcomes in different European countries: ROADSAVER study multicentric insights.不同欧洲国家当代颈动脉支架置入术的实践及围手术期结局:ROADSAVER研究的多中心见解
CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Apr 12;8(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00528-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Pre-emptive False Lumen Embolization to Prevent Persistent Type II Endoleak in Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair of Post-Dissection Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.预防性假腔栓塞以防止夹层后胸腹主动脉瘤开窗分支血管腔内修复术中持续性II型内漏
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Apr 24:15266028241246656. doi: 10.1177/15266028241246656.
2
Impact of Carotid Stent Design on Embolic Filter Debris Load During Carotid Artery Stenting.颈动脉支架设计对颈动脉支架置入术中滤器栓塞碎片负荷的影响。
Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2534-2541. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043117. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Carotid Interventions: Does Sex Matter?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;66(1):15-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.04.036. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Hearing Aid Use Time Is Causally Influenced by Psychological Parameters in Mildly Distressed Patients with Chronic Tinnitus and Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.助听器使用时间受到患有慢性耳鸣和轻至中度听力损失的轻度痛苦患者心理参数的因果影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):5869. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195869.
5
Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉支架置入术联合双层支架:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Jun;31(3):339-349. doi: 10.1177/15266028221126940. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
7
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2023年动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;65(1):7-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
"Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)".“双层微网支架在有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄择期治疗中的真实世界研究(ROADSAVER)”。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Mar;45(3):277-282. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-03051-5. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
9
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.无症状性颈动脉手术试验 2(ACST-2):颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的随机比较
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
10
Contemporary Results of Carotid Artery Stenting Using Low-Profile Dual-Metal Layer Nitinol Micromesh Stents in Relation to Single-Layer Carotid Stents.使用低剖面双层氮钛合金微网支架与单层颈动脉支架治疗颈动脉狭窄的当代结果比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Oct;28(5):726-736. doi: 10.1177/15266028211025046. Epub 2021 Jun 17.