Yakhlef Valentine, Magalhães-Sant'Ana Manuel, Pereira Ana Luísa, Azevedo Alexandre
CIVG-Vasco da Gama Research Center/EUVG-Vasco da Gama University School, Avenida José R. Sousa Fernandes 197, 3020-210 Coimbra, Portugal.
CIISA-Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Lisboa, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal.
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(3):341. doi: 10.3390/ani15030341.
Human perceptions of animal consciousness have evolved over time, influencing how they are treated. This study aimed to assess perceptions of animal consciousness in people working in conservation. An online survey of 87 participants evaluated their perceptions of animals' capabilities across 10 dimensions of consciousness, including self-consciousness, learning, and reasoning. The sum of the answers to the questions was validated as a "perception index" using a principal component analysis. Next, its variation according to taxonomic, demographic, professional factors, and the duration, type, and frequency of interaction with animals was assessed with generalized linear models and stepwise model selection. Participants' perceptions varied with taxonomic class and the level of education, with mammals obtaining higher indexes than birds (-0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.24, -0.03, < 0.01) or reptiles (-0.41; 95% CI -0.55, -0.27, < 0.01), and respondents holding a PhD exhibiting higher perception indexes than those with BScs (-0.19; 95% CI -0.32, -0.06, < 0.01) or lower education (-0.18; 95% CI -0.32, -0.03, = 0.01). The attribution of consciousness followed a phylogenetic pattern, but several exceptions (e.g., the octopus and raven) were noted on a finer scale supporting a multifactorial influence on the perception of animal consciousness that emerges upon a baseline phylogenetic pattern. Finally, the results suggest that conservationists are influenced by culture and scientific knowledge, as much as their personal experiences, when evaluating animals' perceptions, highlighting the need for further research on the convergence between perception, belief, and evidence.
人类对动物意识的认知随时间演变,影响着动物的待遇方式。本研究旨在评估从事保护工作的人员对动物意识的认知。一项针对87名参与者的在线调查评估了他们在意识的10个维度上对动物能力的认知,包括自我意识、学习和推理能力。通过主成分分析,将问题答案的总和验证为一个“认知指数”。接下来,使用广义线性模型和逐步模型选择,评估其根据分类学、人口统计学、专业因素以及与动物互动的持续时间、类型和频率的变化情况。参与者的认知因分类类别和教育程度而异,哺乳动物的得分高于鸟类(-0.14;95%置信区间[CI]-0.24,-0.03,<0.01)或爬行动物(-0.41;95%CI-0.55,-0.27,<0.01),拥有博士学位的受访者的认知得分高于拥有理学学士学位的受访者(-0.19;95%CI-0.32,-0.06,<0.01)或教育程度较低的受访者(-0.18;95%CI-0.32,-0.03,=0.01)。意识的归因遵循系统发育模式,但在更精细的层面上发现了一些例外情况(如章鱼和乌鸦),这支持了在基线系统发育模式基础上对动物意识认知的多因素影响。最后,研究结果表明,保护主义者在评估动物认知时,受到文化、科学知识以及个人经历的影响,这凸显了对认知、信念和证据之间的趋同进行进一步研究的必要性。