Quadros Victor, Inman Brady, McDonnell Nina, Williams Kaitlyn, Romero L Michael, Woodhams Douglas C
Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125, USA.
Department of Biology, Tufts University, Robinson Hall, Rm 369200 College Ave., Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Conserv Physiol. 2025 Feb 11;13(1):coaf005. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coaf005. eCollection 2025.
Ongoing amphibian population declines are caused by factors such as climate change, habitat destruction, pollution and infectious diseases not limited to chytridiomycosis. Unfortunately, action is taken against these factors once population collapses are underway. To avoid these responses, wildlife endocrinology aims to analyse physiological mediators that predict future population declines to inform wildlife management. Mediators typically investigated are stress hormones known as glucocorticoids, which are produced by the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Interrenal axis (HPI axis). The HPI axis is the part of the endocrine system that helps amphibians cope with stress. Chronic increases in glucocorticoids due to stress can lead to immune dysfunction, which makes amphibians more susceptible to infectious diseases. Despite this predictive potential of glucocorticoids, interpretation of glucocorticoid data is confounded by sampling design and type. Glucocorticoid monitoring classically involves blood sampling, which is not widely applicable in amphibians as some are too small or delicate to sample, and repeated samples are often valued. To address this, we tried to validate skin swabbing via corticosterone (CORT) and adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) injections in adults of two amphibian species: Eastern red-spotted newts, with natural skin infections with () upon collection in the field, and Northern leopard frogs, raised in captivity and naïve to exposure. Further, we determined the predictive potential of skin glucocorticoids on load in the field via correlations in Eastern red-spotted newts. We found that hormones present in the skin are not related to the HPI axis and poorly predict infection load; however, skin hormone levels strongly predicted survival in captivity. Although skin swabbing is not a valid method to monitor HPI axis function in these species, the hormones present in the skin still play important roles in organismal physiology under stressful conditions relevant to wildlife managers.
两栖动物种群数量持续下降是由气候变化、栖息地破坏、污染和传染病(不限于壶菌病)等因素造成的。不幸的是,一旦种群数量开始崩溃,才会针对这些因素采取行动。为避免这种情况,野生动物内分泌学旨在分析能够预测未来种群数量下降的生理调节因子,为野生动物管理提供信息。通常研究的调节因子是被称为糖皮质激素的应激激素,它由下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾间轴(HPI轴)产生。HPI轴是内分泌系统的一部分,帮助两栖动物应对压力。由于压力导致的糖皮质激素长期增加会导致免疫功能障碍,使两栖动物更容易感染传染病。尽管糖皮质激素具有这种预测潜力,但糖皮质激素数据的解读因采样设计和类型而变得复杂。糖皮质激素监测传统上涉及采血,这在两栖动物中并不广泛适用,因为有些两栖动物太小或太脆弱而无法采样,而且重复采样往往很有价值。为了解决这个问题,我们试图通过对两种两栖动物的成年个体注射皮质酮(CORT)和促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)来验证皮肤擦拭法:野外采集时自然皮肤感染()的东部红背蝾螈,以及圈养且未接触过()的北美豹蛙。此外,我们通过东部红背蝾螈的相关性确定了皮肤糖皮质激素对野外()负荷的预测潜力。我们发现皮肤中存在的激素与HPI轴无关,对感染负荷的预测能力很差;然而,皮肤激素水平强烈预测了圈养中的存活率。虽然皮肤擦拭法不是监测这些物种HPI轴功能的有效方法,但皮肤中存在的激素在与野生动物管理者相关的压力条件下的机体生理中仍然发挥着重要作用。