Cevik Jevan, Rajaram Rohan, Pollock Michaela, Seth Ishith, M Rozen Warren
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Health, Victoria, Australia; Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2025 Feb 13;60:27-34. doi: 10.2340/jphs.v60.42750.
This systematic review compared the efficacy of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) against percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA) and limited fasciectomy (LF) for Dupuytren's contracture. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to March 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes included successful contracture correction as defined by included studies. Secondary outcomes included recurrence rates, patient-reported outcomes, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies (969 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in efficacy between CCH and PNA (Relative Risk [RR]: 1.01, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.93-1.09). Recurrence rates were also similar (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.95-1.48). Data suggested higher recurrence risk with CCH versus LF (RR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.59-29.48). In some studies, CCH was associated with higher rates of haematoma, local pain, and oedema. CCH demonstrates comparable efficacy to PNA; however, it may have a higher risk of local complications and recurrence compared to LF. Treatment decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.
本系统评价比较了溶组织梭状芽孢杆菌胶原酶(CCH)与经皮针状腱膜切开术(PNA)及有限筋膜切除术(LF)治疗掌腱膜挛缩症的疗效。检索了截至2024年3月的PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库。纳入随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局包括纳入研究定义的挛缩成功矫正。次要结局包括复发率、患者报告结局和不良事件。共纳入11项研究(969例患者)。荟萃分析显示,CCH与PNA在疗效上无差异(相对危险度[RR]:1.01,95%置信区间[CI]:0.93 - 1.09)。复发率也相似(RR:1.18,95% CI:0.95 - 1.48)。数据表明,与LF相比,CCH的复发风险更高(RR:6.84,95% CI:1.59 - 29.48)。在一些研究中,CCH与更高的血肿、局部疼痛和水肿发生率相关。CCH与PNA疗效相当;然而,与LF相比,其局部并发症和复发风险可能更高。治疗决策应根据具体情况做出。