Wei August X, Mournet Annabelle M, Ryan Patrick C, Ruch Donna A, Pao Maryland, Horowitz Lisa M, Bridge Jeffrey A
Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Apr;76(4):599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.241. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) youth are at high suicide risk. Family/peer connectedness may be protective factors; few studies assess social connectedness within cisgender lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (cis-LGBQ) and transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) samples. This study aims to identify associations between family/peer connectedness and suicidal thoughts/behaviors (STBs) among cisgender-LGBQ and TGD youth to better inform suicide prevention strategies.
This study utilized data from LGBTQ youth aged 12-17 in the Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide study. Youth completed measures for STBs (Ask Suicide-Screening Questions and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale) and family/peer connectedness ("low," "moderate," and "high"). Logistic regression analyses examined associations between family/peer connectedness and STBs in cis-LGBQ and TGD youth.
53.2% (607/1,140) of cis-LGBQ and 69.7% (99/142) of TGD youth self-reported STBs. For cis-LGBQ youth, the odds of reporting STBs increased when comparing low/moderate versus high family connectedness (p < .001, adjOR = 9.8[6.8-14.2]; p < .001, adjOR = 3.5[2.7-4.7]) and low versus moderate (p < .001, adjOR = 2.8[1.9-4.0]). Regarding cis-LGBQ peer connectedness, the odds of reporting STBs increased when comparing low/moderate versus high (p < .01, adjOR = 1.8[1.2-2.7]; p < .05, adjOR = 1.5[1.1-2.1]), not low versus moderate (p = .4). For TGD youth, the odds of reporting STBs significantly increased when comparing low/moderate versus high family connectedness (p < .001, adjOR = 9.8[3.7-28.2]; p < .001, adjOR = 7.7[2.8-22.8]), not when comparing low versus moderate (p = .7). Peer connectedness levels had no significant associations with TGD youths' STB rates (p = .2, p = .3, p = .8).
LGBTQ, especially TGD youth, are at elevated suicide risk. High levels of family connectedness may especially help mitigate suicide risk in TGD youth. Future research should replicate findings in larger TGD samples and adapt LGBTQ-specific, family-based emergency department interventions.
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者及酷儿/疑问者(LGBTQ)青少年自杀风险很高。家庭/同伴关系可能是保护因素;很少有研究评估顺性别女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋及酷儿(cis-LGBQ)以及跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)样本中的社会关系。本研究旨在确定cis-LGBQ和TGD青少年中家庭/同伴关系与自杀念头/行为(STB)之间的关联,以便更好地为自杀预防策略提供信息。
本研究使用了来自“青少年自杀风险急诊科筛查”研究中12至17岁LGBTQ青少年的数据。青少年完成了STB测量(询问自杀筛查问题和哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表)以及家庭/同伴关系测量(“低”、“中”和“高”)。逻辑回归分析检验了cis-LGBQ和TGD青少年中家庭/同伴关系与STB之间的关联。
53.2%(607/1140)的cis-LGBQ青少年和69.7%(99/142)的TGD青少年自我报告有STB。对于cis-LGBQ青少年,将低/中度与高度家庭关系进行比较时,报告STB的几率增加(p<.001,校正比值比=9.8[6.8 - 14.2];p<.001,校正比值比=3.5[2.7 - 4.7]),以及将低度与中度进行比较时(p<.001,校正比值比=2.8[1.9 - 4.0])。关于cis-LGBQ同伴关系,将低/中度与高度进行比较时,报告STB的几率增加(p<.01,校正比值比=1.8[1.2 - 2.7];p<.05,校正比值比=1.5[1.1 - 2.1]),而低度与中度比较时则没有增加(p = .4)。对于TGD青少年,将低/中度与高度家庭关系进行比较时,报告STB的几率显著增加(p<.001,校正比值比=9.8[3.7 - 28.2];p<.001,校正比值比=7.7[2.8 - 22.8]),而低度与中度比较时则没有增加(p = .7)。同伴关系水平与TGD青少年的STB发生率没有显著关联(p = .2,p = .3,p = .8)。
LGBTQ,尤其是TGD青少年,自杀风险较高。高度的家庭关系可能特别有助于降低TGD青少年的自杀风险。未来的研究应在更大的TGD样本中重复这些发现,并调整针对LGBTQ的、基于家庭的急诊科干预措施。