Real André Gonzales, Russell Stephen T
Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 Jan;76(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.08.009. Epub 2024 Sep 29.
LGBTQ+ youth are at higher risk for poorer mental health. Studies are typically cross-sectional and categorize cisgender lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) and transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth as a combined group (i.e., LGBTQ+). There is a need for longitudinal studies that examine differences between LGB and TGD youth for a better understanding of their mental health needs.
Data come from a 4-wave longitudinal community-based study collected between 2011 and 2015. Hierarchical Linear Models examined trajectories of depressive symptoms and suicidality, comparing LGB and TGD youth. Between-person and within-person associations were examined, accounting for cumulative experiences of victimization, outness to family, and family acceptance in association with depressive symptoms and suicidality.
The study included a diverse sample of 543 LGB and 118 TGD youth. Although TGD youth had, overall, higher levels of depression and suicidality, both LGB and TGD youth experienced improvement in mental health. Youth who were more out and accepted in family were less depressed and suicidal than youth who were less out and accepted in family. Within individuals, when youth become more out and accepted in family, they concurrently reported less depressive symptoms. The accumulation of victimization experiences was associated with higher levels of depression and suicidality, and more depression for youth across time.
TGD youth face higher stigmatization than LGB youth, contributing to poorer mental health and disparities. Findings suggest that both LGB and TGD youth develop resilience despite victimization, and many find support within their families to cope with stigma.
LGBTQ+青年心理健康状况较差的风险更高。研究通常为横断面研究,将顺性别女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)以及跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)青年归为一个组合群体(即LGBTQ+)。需要进行纵向研究,以检验LGB青年和TGD青年之间的差异,从而更好地了解他们的心理健康需求。
数据来自2011年至2015年间开展的一项基于社区的4波纵向研究。采用分层线性模型研究抑郁症状和自杀倾向的轨迹,比较LGB青年和TGD青年。研究了个体间和个体内的关联,同时考虑了受侵害的累积经历、向家人公开身份的情况以及家人的接受程度与抑郁症状和自杀倾向的关系。
该研究纳入了543名LGB青年和118名TGD青年的多样化样本。尽管总体而言,TGD青年的抑郁和自杀倾向水平较高,但LGB青年和TGD青年的心理健康状况都有所改善。在家庭中更公开且被接受的青年比在家庭中公开程度较低且未被接受的青年抑郁和自杀倾向更低。在个体内部,当青年在家庭中变得更加公开且被接受时,他们同时报告的抑郁症状也更少。受侵害经历的累积与更高水平的抑郁和自杀倾向相关,并且随着时间推移,青年的抑郁情绪会增加。
TGD青年比LGB青年面临更高的污名化,这导致了更差的心理健康状况和差异。研究结果表明,尽管遭受侵害,LGB青年和TGD青年都能培养出恢复力,并且许多人在家庭中找到支持来应对污名。