Shah Vishna, Schmidt Wolf, Sonko Bakary, Sinjanka Edrisa, Mendy Francois, Hennegan Julie, Phillips-Howard Penelope, Torondel Belen
Environmental Health Group, Department of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nutrition Theme, MRCG Keneba, Medical Research Council Unit, Banjul, The Gambia.
J Adolesc Health. 2025 May;76(5):879-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.12.018. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
Evidence on the effect of menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) interventions on education is scarce. This trial assessed the effect of a multicomponent intervention on school attendance, urogenital health, and other wellbeing outcomes among schoolgirls in rural Gambia.
A cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted between July 2019 and December 2020 in 50 villages across 2 regions of The Gambia, selecting one school per village. Using restricted randomisation, half of the villages received a 3-month NGO-led intervention, which included Peer education camps, Mother's outreach sessions, Community meetings and improving school water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). The other 25 villages received no intervention. The primary outcome was self-reported schoolgirls' absenteeism of at least one-day due to last period. Secondary outcomes included: urinary tract infections measured with symptoms and biochemical markers, reproductive tract infections symptoms, menstruation-related wellbeing, social support and knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward menstruation. All menstruating schoolgirls 13 years and older were eligible for outcome assessment. We analyzed data on an intention-to-treat basis.
Outcome assessment included 3556 schoolgirls (1832 [51.5%] in the intervention group and 1724 [48.5%] in the control group). Self-reported school absenteeism was only slightly lower in the intervention arm than the control arm (15.6% vs. 17.1%, risk difference = -1.4%, 95% CI = -4.6%-1.9%). The intervention had no effect on urogenital health but had broad positive effects on menstrual knowledge, attitudes, wellbeing, and social support.
The multicomponent MHH intervention had no effect on absence due to last period, but achieved improvements in MHH knowledge, experiences, and needs.
关于月经健康与卫生(MHH)干预措施对教育影响的证据很少。本试验评估了一项多组分干预措施对冈比亚农村地区女学生的上学出勤率、泌尿生殖系统健康及其他幸福指标的影响。
2019年7月至2020年12月,在冈比亚两个地区的50个村庄开展了一项整群随机对照试验,每个村庄选择一所学校。采用受限随机化方法,一半村庄接受了为期3个月的非政府组织主导的干预措施,包括同伴教育营、母亲外展活动、社区会议以及改善学校的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)。另外25个村庄未接受干预。主要结局是自我报告的女学生因上次月经缺勤至少一天。次要结局包括:通过症状和生化指标测量的尿路感染、生殖道感染症状、与月经相关的幸福感、社会支持以及对月经的知识、态度和行为。所有13岁及以上的月经初潮女学生均符合结局评估条件。我们基于意向性分析对数据进行了分析。
结局评估纳入了3556名女学生(干预组1832名[51.5%],对照组1724名[48.5%])。自我报告的学校缺勤率在干预组仅略低于对照组(15.6%对17.1%,风险差=-1.4%,95%CI=-4.6%-1.9%)。该干预措施对泌尿生殖系统健康没有影响,但对月经知识、态度、幸福感和社会支持产生了广泛的积极影响。
多组分MHH干预措施对因上次月经导致的缺勤没有影响,但在MHH知识、体验和需求方面取得了改善。