Tran Elaine, Thornberg David, Datcu Anne-Marie, Jo Chan-Hee, Ramo Brandon
Cohen Children's Medical Center, Center Northwell Health Physician Partners - Pediatric Orthopaedics, 7 Vermont Drive, New Hyde Park, NY, 11042, USA.
Scottish Rite for Children Dept of Orthopedics, 2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA.
Spine Deform. 2025 Feb 13. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01058-3.
Pain catastrophizing has been linked to poorer patient-reported pain outcomes for orthopedic surgery, but its effect on perioperative pain and narcotic use is poorly understood. Our purpose was to determine if pain catastrophizing has a negative effect on perceptions of perioperative pain and narcotic use in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for idiopathic scoliosis (IS).
A retrospective, IRB-approved review of prospectively collected data of IS patients undergoing PSF. Patients were considered PCs when they scored above the 75th percentile in the PCS (total score ≥ 30). Inpatient narcotic consumption was calculated as morphine equivalent per Kg (mEq/Kg).
Five hundred seventeen patients (411F, 106M) underwent PSF for IS. Forty-five (8.7%) patients were pain catastrophizers (PCs). PC patients had significantly lower pain, appearance, and mental scores. PCs scored slightly higher on VAS pain scores (2.20 vs 1.92, p = 0.015) in the first 24 h only. There were no differences in opioid use between PC vs. non-PC cohorts for inpatient (2.01 vs 2.14 mEq/Kg, p = 0.4), discharge (5.6 vs 5.87 mEq/Kg, p = 0.3), or total narcotics (7.61 v 8.01 mEq/Kg, p = 0.2). Fifty-five patients out of five hundred seventeen requested narcotic refills with no difference in refill rates between cohorts (p = 0.7076).
We found that pain catastrophizers had lower pre-operative SRS-30 scores across all domains except satisfaction. We found no association between pain catastrophizing and increased opioid use in either the inpatient stay or post-discharge. While pain catastrophizing has been associated with lower pre- and post-operative pain scores, it does not appear to predispose to higher narcotic utilization perioperatively.
II: retrospective comparative study.
疼痛灾难化与骨科手术患者报告的较差疼痛结局相关,但其对围手术期疼痛和麻醉药物使用的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定疼痛灾难化是否对特发性脊柱侧凸(IS)行后路脊柱融合术(PSF)患者的围手术期疼痛认知和麻醉药物使用有负面影响。
对前瞻性收集的IS行PSF患者的数据进行一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。当患者在疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)中得分高于第75百分位数(总分≥30)时,被视为疼痛灾难化者(PCs)。住院期间麻醉药物消耗量按每千克吗啡当量(mEq/Kg)计算。
517例患者(411例女性,106例男性)因IS接受了PSF。45例(8.7%)患者为疼痛灾难化者(PCs)。PC患者的疼痛、外观和心理评分显著较低。仅在最初24小时内,PC患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分略高(2.20对1.92,p = 0.015)。PC组与非PC组在住院期间(2.01对2.14 mEq/Kg,p = 0.4)、出院时(5.6对5.87 mEq/Kg,p = 0.3)或麻醉药物总量(7.61对8.01 mEq/Kg,p = 0.2)的阿片类药物使用方面无差异。517例患者中有55例要求补充麻醉药物,两组之间的补充率无差异(p = 0.7076)。
我们发现,除满意度外,疼痛灾难化者在所有领域的术前脊柱侧凸研究学会-30(SRS-30)评分均较低。我们发现在住院期间或出院后,疼痛灾难化与阿片类药物使用增加之间无关联。虽然疼痛灾难化与术前和术后较低的疼痛评分相关,但在围手术期它似乎不会导致更高的麻醉药物使用率。
II级:回顾性比较研究。