Konen Franz F, Wurster Ulrich, Schwenkenbecher Philipp, Gerritzen Andreas, Groß Catharina C, Eichhorn Peter, Harrer Andrea, Isenmann Stefan, Lewczuk Piotr, Lewerenz Jan, Leypoldt Frank, Otto Markus, Regeniter Axel, Roskos Martin, Ruprecht Klemens, Spreer Annette, Strik Herwig, Uhr Manfred, Wick Manfred, Wildemann Brigitte, Wiltfang Jens, Zimmermann Thomas, Hannich Malte, Khalil Michael, Tumani Hayrettin, Süße Marie, Skripuletz Thomas
Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Medical Laboratory Bremen, 28357 Bremen, Germany.
Autoimmun Rev. 2025 Apr 30;24(5):103765. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2025.103765. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
The 2024-revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) proposed to incorporate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-specific oligoclonal bands and kappa free light chains (KFLC) as diagnostic biomarkers. While the 2017-revised criteria highlighted CSF-specific oligoclonal bands to indicate intrathecal IgG synthesis, significantly enhancing early MS diagnosis, KFLC have emerged as additional marker. Now, the question rises of whether both biomarkers serve as competing or complementary tools in MS diagnostics.
In this narrative review, we extensively searched the literature on oligoclonal bands and KFLC determination in CSF and serum across neurological disorders, with a focus on MS, using the PubMed database to demonstrate the complementarity of both biomarkers.
Oligoclonal bands have long been a reliable marker of intrathecal IgG synthesis in MS, valued for their high diagnostic sensitivity, unique patient "fingerprints," clonality differentiation, semi-quantitative analysis, and pre-analytic robustness. However, they present challenges in standardization, labor-intensity, method variability, examiner dependency, and limited data on non-IgG immunoglobulins. Quantitative KFLC measurement provides rapid, examiner-independent, and cost-effective assessment across all immunoglobulin classes but might have lower specificity, lacked consensus on standardized interpretation in recent years, and is not yet supported by comprehensive prospective multinational studies on its prognostic role.
Both oligoclonal bands and KFLC have unique strengths and limitations that complement each other, potentially serving as complementary markers for evaluating intrathecal Ig synthesis in MS diagnosis. Further evidence is needed to establish the value of KFLC in MS diagnosis, thus multicenter prospective studies are being conducted to compare the diagnostic utility of both markers.
2024年修订的多发性硬化症(MS)麦克唐纳标准提议将脑脊液(CSF)特异性寡克隆带和κ游离轻链(KFLC)纳入诊断生物标志物。虽然2017年修订的标准强调脑脊液特异性寡克隆带可指示鞘内IgG合成,显著提高了MS的早期诊断率,但KFLC已成为另一种标志物。现在,问题来了,这两种生物标志物在MS诊断中是相互竞争还是互补的工具。
在本叙述性综述中,我们广泛检索了PubMed数据库中关于神经系统疾病患者脑脊液和血清中寡克隆带和KFLC测定的文献,重点关注MS,以证明这两种生物标志物的互补性。
寡克隆带长期以来一直是MS中鞘内IgG合成的可靠标志物,因其高诊断敏感性、独特的患者“指纹”、克隆性分化、半定量分析和分析前稳定性而受到重视。然而,它们在标准化、劳动强度、方法变异性、检查者依赖性以及非IgG免疫球蛋白数据有限等方面存在挑战。定量KFLC测量可对所有免疫球蛋白类别进行快速、独立于检查者且具有成本效益的评估,但特异性可能较低,近年来在标准化解释方面缺乏共识,且尚未得到关于其预后作用的全面前瞻性多国研究的支持。
寡克隆带和KFLC都有独特的优势和局限性,它们相互补充,可能作为评估MS诊断中鞘内Ig合成的互补标志物。需要进一步的证据来确定KFLC在MS诊断中的价值,因此正在进行多中心前瞻性研究以比较这两种标志物的诊断效用。