Chen Jie, Yan Alice Shijia
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
The Hospital And Public health InterdisciPlinarY research (HAPPY) Lab, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Med Care. 2025 Mar 1;63(3):227-233. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002110. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
To understand the variation in artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) adoption across different hospital characteristics and explore how AI/ML is utilized, particularly in relation to neighborhood deprivation.
AI/ML-assisted care coordination has the potential to reduce health disparities, but there is a lack of empirical evidence on AI's impact on health equity.
We used linked datasets from the 2022 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and the 2023 American Hospital Association Information Technology Supplement. The data were further linked to the 2022 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) for each hospital's service area. State fixed-effect regressions were employed. A decomposition model was also used to quantify predictors of AI/ML implementation, comparing hospitals in higher versus lower ADI areas.
Hospitals serving the most vulnerable areas (ADI Q4) were significantly less likely to apply ML or other predictive models (coef = -0.10, P = 0.01) and provided fewer AI/ML-related workforce applications (coef = -0.40, P = 0.01), compared with those in the least vulnerable areas. Decomposition results showed that our model specifications explained 79% of the variation in AI/ML adoption between hospitals in ADI Q4 versus ADI Q1-Q3. In addition, Accountable Care Organization affiliation accounted for 12%-25% of differences in AI/ML utilization across various measures.
The underuse of AI/ML in economically disadvantaged and rural areas, particularly in workforce management and electronic health record implementation, suggests that these communities may not fully benefit from advancements in AI-enabled health care. Our results further indicate that value-based payment models could be strategically used to support AI integration.
了解不同医院特征下人工智能/机器学习(AI/ML)应用的差异,并探讨AI/ML的利用方式,特别是与社区贫困程度的关系。
AI/ML辅助的护理协调有减少健康差距的潜力,但缺乏关于AI对健康公平影响的实证证据。
我们使用了来自2022年美国医院协会年度调查和2023年美国医院协会信息技术补充调查的关联数据集。这些数据进一步与每家医院服务区域的2022年地区贫困指数(ADI)相关联。采用了州固定效应回归。还使用了一个分解模型来量化AI/ML实施的预测因素,比较高ADI地区和低ADI地区的医院。
与最不易受影响地区的医院相比,为最脆弱地区(ADI第四季度)服务的医院应用ML或其他预测模型的可能性显著降低(系数=-0.10,P=0.01),且提供的与AI/ML相关的劳动力应用较少(系数=-0.40,P=0.01)。分解结果表明,我们的模型规格解释了ADI第四季度与ADI第一至第三季度医院之间AI/ML应用差异的79%。此外,负责医疗组织的隶属关系在各项措施中占AI/ML利用差异的12%-25%。
经济弱势和农村地区对AI/ML的利用不足,特别是在劳动力管理和电子健康记录实施方面,表明这些社区可能无法充分受益于人工智能支持的医疗保健进步。我们的结果进一步表明,基于价值的支付模式可被战略性地用于支持AI整合。