• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

白内障手术中可重复使用器械与一次性器械的碳足迹比较研究。

Comparative carbon footprinting study of reusable vs. disposable instruments in cataract surgery.

作者信息

McCance Eleanor, Steinbach Ingeborg, Morris Daniel S

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1481-1485. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03656-x. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1038/s41433-025-03656-x
PMID:39948404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12089468/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Theatre activity is a major source of hospital waste, accounting for 21-30% of total output, and is 3-6 times more energy-intensive than any other hospital department. Cataract remains the leading cause of blindness worldwide, and cataract surgery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, but to date has received little analysis in this field. The aim of this study was to evaluate the carbon impact of streamlining single-use packs, and transitioning from single-use items, to reusable equivalents in cataract surgery.

METHODS

A focus group and prospective audit was carried out to identify single-use pack items for streamlining. A bottom-up, process-based carbon footprint analysis was conducted of single-use items and reusable alternatives using activity data provided by the suppliers and greenhouse gas (GHG) conversion factors from the UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting database.

RESULTS

Total carbon savings from streamlining was 935 kgCO2e/year, and switching, was 309 kgCO2e/year. Single-use items had a 27 times greater carbon footprint than reusable equivalents (322 kgCO2 vs. 12 kgCO2e respectively). A net carbon saving was achieved from 19 or more re-uses of the reusable items compared to single-use equivalents.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of carbon emissions savings both from streamlining disposable instruments in cataract surgical packs, and from switching from single-use to reusable instruments. Mitigation strategies targeting hotspots in resource intensive areas will be an important aspect of reducing the climate burden of surgery. Change in practice and policy is required in all surgical specialities to realize net zero carbon healthcare.

摘要

背景

手术室活动是医院废物的主要来源,占总产出的21%-30%,且能源密集程度是医院其他任何科室的3-6倍。白内障仍是全球失明的主要原因,白内障手术是全球最常开展的外科手术,但迄今为止该领域对此几乎没有分析。本研究的目的是评估简化一次性包装以及在白内障手术中从一次性物品过渡到可重复使用等效物品对碳的影响。

方法

开展焦点小组讨论和前瞻性审计以确定需简化的一次性包装物品。利用供应商提供的活动数据和英国政府公司报告温室气体换算因子数据库中的温室气体(GHG)换算因子,对一次性物品和可重复使用替代品进行了自下而上的基于过程的碳足迹分析。

结果

简化操作每年可节省935千克二氧化碳当量的碳,改用可重复使用物品每年可节省309千克二氧化碳当量的碳。一次性物品的碳足迹比可重复使用等效物品大27倍(分别为322千克二氧化碳和12千克二氧化碳当量)。与一次性等效物品相比,可重复使用物品重复使用19次或更多次可实现净碳节约。

结论

本研究证明了在白内障手术包中简化一次性器械以及从一次性器械改用可重复使用器械均可节省碳排放。针对资源密集领域热点的缓解策略将是减轻手术气候负担的一个重要方面。所有外科专业都需要改变实践和政策,以实现医疗保健的净零碳排放。

相似文献

1
Comparative carbon footprinting study of reusable vs. disposable instruments in cataract surgery.白内障手术中可重复使用器械与一次性器械的碳足迹比较研究。
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1481-1485. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03656-x. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响?以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
3
A Cost and Waste-Savings Comparison Between Single-Use and Reusable Pulse Oximetry Sensors Across US Operating Rooms.单用途与可重复使用脉搏血氧饱和度传感器在美国手术室中的成本和节约比较。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jul 1;139(1):220-225. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006778. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
4
Carbon Footprint of Laparoscopic Appendicectomy: A Prospective Observational Study at a Tertiary Care NHS Trust Hospital.腹腔镜阑尾切除术的碳足迹:在一家国民保健服务信托三级医院进行的前瞻性观察研究
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84870. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84870. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery.预防性使用非甾体抗炎药预防白内障手术后黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD006683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006683.pub3.
6
A Comparative Carbon Footprint and Cost Analysis of Uterine Manipulators for Hysterectomy.子宫切除术子宫操纵器的碳足迹与成本比较分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):104-112. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005949.
7
Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.用于减少烟草使用的烟草包装设计。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 27;4(4):CD011244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011244.pub2.
8
Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.白内障摘除术后三焦点与扩展景深(EDOF)人工晶状体的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 10;7(7):CD014891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2.
9
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroids for controlling inflammation after uncomplicated cataract surgery.非甾体抗炎药与皮质类固醇用于控制单纯性白内障手术后的炎症
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 3;7(7):CD010516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010516.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.一次性器械在常规白内障手术中的经济与环境影响评估
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 3;18:2481-2485. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S467872. eCollection 2024.
2
National Eye Institute's (NEI) coordination efforts and current opportunities for sustainability, adaptation, and climate resilience in global eye health - ARVO 2023 session commentary.美国国立眼科研究所(NEI)在全球眼健康领域的协调工作以及当前实现可持续性、适应性和气候恢复力的机遇——2023年视觉与眼科学研究协会(ARVO)会议评论
Eye (Lond). 2024 Aug;38(11):1984-1985. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02854-9. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
3
The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes.五种常见手术中使用的产品的碳足迹:确定相关产品和流程。
J R Soc Med. 2023 Jun;116(6):199-213. doi: 10.1177/01410768231166135. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
4
The impact of switching from single-use to reusable healthcare products: a transparency checklist and systematic review of life-cycle assessments.从一次性使用到可重复使用的医疗保健产品的影响:透明度清单和生命周期评估的系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):56-63. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac174.
5
Minimising carbon and financial costs of steam sterilisation and packaging of reusable surgical instruments.尽量降低可重复使用手术器械的蒸汽灭菌和包装的碳足迹和财务成本。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):200-210. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab406.
6
Our over-reliance on single-use equipment in the operating theatre is misguided, irrational and harming our planet.我们在手术室过度依赖一次性设备是错误的、不合理的,并且正在损害我们的星球。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Nov;103(10):709-712. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0297.
7
Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中国产混合(可重复使用/一次性)器械与一次性器械等效物的环境影响和生命周期财务成本。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4067-4078. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08728-z. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care.在气候危机下运作:手术和麻醉护理中的生命周期评估科学综述。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jul;129(7):76001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8666. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
9
Transforming The Medical Device Industry: Road Map To A Circular Economy.医疗器械行业的转型:迈向循环经济之路。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Dec;39(12):2088-2097. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01118.
10
Survey of cataract surgeons' and nurses' attitudes toward operating room waste.白内障手术医生和护士对手术室浪费态度的调查。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Jul;46(7):933-940. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000267.