Suppr超能文献

一次性器械在常规白内障手术中的经济与环境影响评估

Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.

作者信息

Qin Vincent, LaHood Ben, Guber Ivo, Di Simplicio Cherubini Sandro

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Delta Hospital (CHIREC), Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Medical du Val, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 3;18:2481-2485. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S467872. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To estimate the economic and environmental impact of single-use instruments (SUIs) to perform standard cataract surgery in six ophthalmology centers located in Europe and in the United States.

SETTING

Online survey and interview.

DESIGN

Comparative cost analysis based on an online survey with follow-up questionnaire and interview. The carbon footprint calculation was made by ClimatePartner.

METHODS

Annual costs of reusable instruments (RUIs) were calculated based on data provided by the centers. Annual costs of SUIs were estimated based on the average-selling price of a single-use cataract set of 5 instruments and the reported annual volume of cataract surgery. The calculation carbon footprint of a cataract instrument covered the whole life cycle from production to end-of-life.

RESULTS

Annual costs for SUIs were found inferior or similar to the annual costs for RUIs for 4 out of the 6 centers included in this study. The centers where SUIs were demonstrated to be the most cost-effective were also associated with the highest costs of sterilization per instrument. The carbon footprint of 5-years usage of a cataract instrument was found to be 5478.2 kg CO for SUIs without recycling, 4639.9 kg CO for SUIs with recycling and 20.6 kg CO for RUIs.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that SUIs can be an alternative solution to using RUIs in multispecialty hospitals associated with high sterilization costs.

摘要

目的

评估一次性器械(SUI)在欧洲和美国的六个眼科中心进行标准白内障手术时的经济和环境影响。

设置

在线调查和访谈。

设计

基于在线调查及后续问卷和访谈的比较成本分析。碳足迹计算由气候伙伴公司完成。

方法

根据各中心提供的数据计算可重复使用器械(RUI)的年度成本。基于一套包含5件器械的一次性白内障手术套装的平均售价及报告的白内障手术年手术量估算SUI的年度成本。白内障器械的碳足迹计算涵盖从生产到报废的整个生命周期。

结果

本研究纳入的6个中心中,有4个中心的SUI年度成本低于或与RUI年度成本相似。SUI被证明最具成本效益的中心,其每件器械的灭菌成本也最高。发现一套白内障器械使用5年的碳足迹,无回收的SUI为5478.2千克二氧化碳,有回收的SUI为4639.9千克二氧化碳,RUI为20.6千克二氧化碳。

结论

该研究表明,在灭菌成本高的多专科医院中,SUI可作为使用RUI的替代解决方案。

相似文献

1
Estimation of the Economic and Environmental Impact of Single-Use Instruments in Routine Cataract Surgery.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 3;18:2481-2485. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S467872. eCollection 2024.
3
Costs associated with instrument sterilization in gynecologic surgery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):652.e1-652.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Economic Impact Analysis of Custom Pak on Cataract and Vitreoretinal Surgery in the United States.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Nov 10;14:715-730. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S382188. eCollection 2022.
9
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

2
Comparative carbon footprinting study of reusable vs. disposable instruments in cataract surgery.
Eye (Lond). 2025 Jun;39(8):1481-1485. doi: 10.1038/s41433-025-03656-x. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors contributing to the carbon footprint of cataract surgery.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Jul 1;49(7):759-763. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001204.
2
Survey of ESCRS members' attitudes toward operating room waste.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Apr 1;49(4):341-347. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001096.
4
The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in a French University Hospital.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Jan;45(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Processing and Handling Cost of Single-use Versus Traditional Instrumentation for 1 Level Lumbar Fusions.
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Feb 1;34(1):E39-E44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001033.
6
Single-use versus reusable medical devices in spinal fusion surgery: a hospital micro-costing analysis.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Dec;29(8):1631-1637. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02517-0. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jan;87(1-2):28-33. doi: 10.1111/ans.13856. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
8
The carbon footprint of cataract surgery.
Eye (Lond). 2013 Apr;27(4):495-501. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.9. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
10
Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Dec;173(6):1812-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90432-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验