Suppr超能文献

尽量降低可重复使用手术器械的蒸汽灭菌和包装的碳足迹和财务成本。

Minimising carbon and financial costs of steam sterilisation and packaging of reusable surgical instruments.

机构信息

Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.

BSMS Teaching Building, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 1;109(2):200-210. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab406.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to estimate the carbon footprint and financial cost of decontaminating (steam sterilization) and packaging reusable surgical instruments, indicating how that burden might be reduced, enabling surgeons to drive action towards net-zero-carbon surgery.

METHODS

Carbon footprints were estimated using activity data and prospective machine-loading audit data at a typical UK in-hospital sterilization unit, with instruments wrapped individually in flexible pouches, or prepared as sets housed in single-use tray wraps or reusable rigid containers. Modelling was used to determine the impact of alternative machine loading, opening instruments during the operation, streamlining sets, use of alternative energy sources for decontamination, and alternative waste streams.

RESULTS

The carbon footprint of decontaminating and packaging instruments was lowest when instruments were part of sets (66-77 g CO2e per instrument), with a two- to three-fold increase when instruments were wrapped individually (189 g CO2e per instrument). Where 10 or fewer instruments were required for the operation, obtaining individually wrapped items was preferable to opening another set. The carbon footprint was determined significantly by machine loading and the number of instruments per machine slot. Carbon and financial costs increased with streamlining sets. High-temperature incineration of waste increased the carbon footprint of single-use packaging by 33-55 per cent, whereas recycling reduced this by 6-10 per cent. The absolute carbon footprint was dependent on the energy source used, but this did not alter the optimal processes to minimize that footprint.

CONCLUSION

Carbon and financial savings can be made by preparing instruments as part of sets, integrating individually wrapped instruments into sets rather than streamlining them, efficient machine loading, and using low-carbon energy sources alongside recycling.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估对可重复使用的手术器械进行去污(蒸汽灭菌)和包装的碳足迹和财务成本,说明如何减少这一负担,使外科医生能够采取行动实现零碳手术。

方法

在英国典型的院内灭菌单位,使用活动数据和前瞻性机器装载审核数据来估算碳足迹,器械单独用弹性袋包装,或作为单个使用的托盘包装或可重复使用的刚性容器中的套件进行准备。使用模型来确定替代机器装载、在手术过程中打开器械、简化套件、替代去污能源的使用以及替代废物流的影响。

结果

当器械作为套件的一部分时,对器械进行去污和包装的碳足迹最低(每个器械 66-77 克二氧化碳当量),而当器械单独包装时,碳足迹增加了两到三倍(每个器械 189 克二氧化碳当量)。如果手术需要的器械少于 10 个,那么获得单独包装的器械比打开另一个套件更可取。碳足迹主要由机器装载和每台机器插槽中的器械数量决定。简化套件会增加碳足迹和财务成本。高温焚烧废物会使一次性包装的碳足迹增加 33-55%,而回收则会减少 6-10%。绝对碳足迹取决于所使用的能源,但这并没有改变最小化碳足迹的最佳流程。

结论

通过将器械作为套件的一部分准备、将单独包装的器械集成到套件中而不是简化它们、高效的机器装载以及结合回收利用使用低碳能源,可以节省碳和财务成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a621/10364739/84a190c9a6bf/znab406f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验