Suppr超能文献

定性研究中对概念框架的依赖——前进的方向。

The reliance on conceptual frameworks in qualitative research - a way forward.

作者信息

Sale Joanna E M, Carlin Leslie

机构信息

Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.

Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02461-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While acknowledging that theory can be critical to scientific progress, we are concerned about instances of its tendency to encroach on, or replace, deep engagement with data in qualitative research. We discuss conceptual frameworks' role in conducting and teaching qualitative research.

METHODS

We address three questions about our attachment as researchers to theory through conceptual frameworks: (1) What do conceptual frameworks offer qualitative research?; (2) Why do researchers use and teach conceptual frameworks in qualitative research?; and (3) How can we practice and teach rigour while integrating conceptual frameworks in qualitative research?

RESULTS

One way that theory may be misused in qualitative research is in the development and reliance on conceptual frameworks as a prescription for data collection and analysis. We suggest possible ways forward to ensure rigour while integrating frameworks in qualitative research, such as examining the evolution of our own theoretical perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

We need to impart to our students the value of thinking deeply about their own data, of knowing what came before, and of taking the time and making an effort to unite these strands into novel and interesting results.

摘要

背景

虽然承认理论对科学进步至关重要,但我们担心在定性研究中,理论有侵蚀或取代深入数据研究的倾向。我们讨论概念框架在定性研究的开展和教学中的作用。

方法

我们通过概念框架探讨关于研究人员对理论的依赖的三个问题:(1)概念框架为定性研究提供了什么?;(2)为什么研究人员在定性研究中使用和教授概念框架?;(3)在定性研究中整合概念框架时,我们如何实践和教授严谨性?

结果

理论在定性研究中可能被滥用的一种方式是在概念框架的开发和依赖中,将其作为数据收集和分析的规定。我们提出了在定性研究中整合框架时确保严谨性的可能方法,例如审视我们自己理论观点的演变。

结论

我们需要向学生传授深入思考自己数据的价值、了解之前的情况,以及花时间并努力将这些方面整合为新颖有趣结果的重要性。

相似文献

7
Six ways to get a grip on developing reflexivity statements.掌握撰写反思性陈述的六种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Nov 13;15(5):146-149. doi: 10.36834/cmej.78824. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research.反思性:提升质性研究的严谨性
Nurs Stand. 2009;23(23):42-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2009.02.23.23.42.c6800.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative research is a fundamental scientific process.定性研究是一种基本的科学过程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation.知识转化的一些理论基础。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):936-41. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.004.
5
The OFF theory of research utilization.研究利用的“脱离”理论
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;58(2):113-6; discussion 117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.002.
8
Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin.定性分析:是什么以及如何开始。
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Aug;18(4):371-5. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180411.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验