Office of Professional Development and Educational Scholarship, Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's Health Sciences, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Nov 13;15(5):146-149. doi: 10.36834/cmej.78824. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Qualitative researchers have underscored the value and importance of being reflexive in the research process, yet existing guidelines or checklists on how to practically address reflexivity are often scant and scattered across studies. In this scholarly perspective, we review, analyse, and present an overview of conceptions of reflexivity. Further, we offer practical guidelines for addressing and developing reflexivity statements in qualitative research. We describe reflexivity as both a concept and a deliberate ongoing process that requires a certain level of researcher consciousness, reflection, introspection, self-awareness, and an analytic attention to the researcher's role in the research process at all stages. We highlight the notion that reflexivity offers researchers an opportunity to examine potential assumptions, through the continuous process of questioning, examining, accepting, and articulating our attitudes, assumptions, perspectives, and roles. We present six recommendations to promote dialogue on the practice of reflexivity among researchers from various ontological and epistemological communities and encourage them to develop their own reflexivity practices.
定性研究人员强调了在研究过程中保持反思的价值和重要性,但关于如何实际解决反思问题的现有指南或清单往往很少,并且分散在各个研究中。在这篇学术观点中,我们回顾、分析并概述了反思的概念。此外,我们还为定性研究中解决和制定反思性陈述提供了实用指南。我们将反思描述为一个概念和一个有意识的持续过程,需要研究人员具有一定的意识、反思、内省、自我意识,并在研究过程的所有阶段都对研究人员的角色进行分析关注。我们强调,反思为研究人员提供了一个机会,通过不断地提问、检查、接受和表达我们的态度、假设、观点和角色,来检查潜在的假设。我们提出了六项建议,以促进来自不同本体论和认识论社区的研究人员之间关于反思实践的对话,并鼓励他们发展自己的反思实践。