Chen Sophia Y, Kung Heng-Chung, Espinoza Birginia, Washington India, Chen Kai, Mu Kaiyi, Zlomke Haley, Loycano Michael, Wang Rulin, Burns William R, Fu Juan, Zheng Lei
Department of Oncology and The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2025 Feb 13;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40164-025-00607-w.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a heterogeneous tumor microenvironment (TME). The mechanism by which this heterogeneity confers resistance against immunotherapy remains unclear. Interleukin- 1β (IL-1β) is a proinflammatory cytokine that regulates heterogeneous cancer associated fibroblast (CAF) phenotype and promotes an immunosuppressive TME. Anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody significantly enhanced the anti-tumor activity of anti-PD-1 in a preclinical model of PDAC. However, clinical trials have shown limited activity of the anti-IL-1β and anti-PD-1 combination. Therefore, we hypothesize that anti-tumor immune response to the combination of anti-IL-1β and anti-PD-1 antibodies is context-dependent and would be affected by the TME heterogeneity in PDAC.
Liver- and lung-specific metastasis mouse models of PDAC were used to investigate the antitumor activity of anti-IL-1β and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination by ultrasound examination and survival analysis. Their effects on the TME heterogeneity were assessed by flow cytometry and single nuclear RNA sequencing.
The combination of anti-IL-1β and anti-PD-1 antibodies does not slow primary tumor growth but prolongs overall survival and reduces lung metastasis rates in a PDAC orthotopic murine model with lung metastasis tropism. In contrast, combination therapy slows primary tumor growth and prolongs survival, but does not reduce liver metastasis rates in a PDAC murine orthotopic model with liver metastasis tropism. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the combination of anti-IL-1β and anti-PD-1 antibodies restores T cell activation negated by the monotherapies. Mechanistically, in the PDAC model with lung metastasis tropism, but not in the model with liver metastasis tropism, combination treatment reverses an increased trend of immunosuppressive myeloid cells as a result of monotherapy. Single-nuclear RNA sequencing analysis of both organ-specific tumor models demonstrated that anti-IL-1β treatment altered infiltration and function of CAF and immune cells differently. Furthermore, anti-IL-1β treatment modulated cytokine/chemokine ligand-receptor-receptor interactions in the models with different organ-specific metastasis distinctly.
This study reveals the differential responses of organ-specific metastasis mouse models of PDAC with distinct TMEs to anti-IL-1β and anti-PD-1 treatments, suggesting that treatment response is context-dependent and affected by TME heterogeneity.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的特征是肿瘤微环境(TME)具有异质性。这种异质性赋予免疫治疗抗性的机制尚不清楚。白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)是一种促炎细胞因子,可调节异质性癌症相关成纤维细胞(CAF)表型并促进免疫抑制性TME。在PDAC的临床前模型中,抗IL-1β单克隆抗体显著增强了抗PD-1的抗肿瘤活性。然而,临床试验显示抗IL-1β和抗PD-1联合治疗的活性有限。因此,我们假设抗IL-1β和抗PD-1抗体联合治疗的抗肿瘤免疫反应取决于具体情况,并会受到PDAC中TME异质性的影响。
使用PDAC的肝和肺特异性转移小鼠模型,通过超声检查和生存分析来研究抗IL-1β和抗PD-1抗体单独或联合使用的抗肿瘤活性。通过流式细胞术和单核RNA测序评估它们对TME异质性的影响。
在具有肺转移倾向的PDAC原位小鼠模型中,抗IL-1β和抗PD-1抗体联合使用不会减缓原发性肿瘤生长,但可延长总生存期并降低肺转移率。相比之下,在具有肝转移倾向的PDAC小鼠原位模型中,联合治疗可减缓原发性肿瘤生长并延长生存期,但不会降低肝转移率。流式细胞术分析表明,抗IL-1β和抗PD-1抗体联合使用可恢复被单一疗法消除的T细胞活化。从机制上讲,在具有肺转移倾向的PDAC模型中,而非具有肝转移倾向的模型中,联合治疗可逆转单一疗法导致的免疫抑制性髓样细胞增加趋势。对两种器官特异性肿瘤模型的单核RNA测序分析表明,抗IL-1β治疗对CAF和免疫细胞的浸润及功能产生了不同的影响。此外,抗IL-1β治疗在具有不同器官特异性转移的模型中对细胞因子/趋化因子配体-受体-受体相互作用的调节明显不同。
本研究揭示了具有不同TME的PDAC器官特异性转移小鼠模型对抗IL-1β和抗PD-1治疗的不同反应,表明治疗反应取决于具体情况,并受TME异质性影响。