Glise Sandblad Katarina, Rosengren Annika, Schulman Sam, Roupe Maria, Sandström Tatiana Zverkova, Philipson Jacob, Svennerholm Kristina, Tavoly Mazdak
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Medicine, Geriatrics and Emergency Medicine, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Intern Med. 2025 Apr;297(4):382-399. doi: 10.1111/joim.20067. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
The risk of major bleeding from anticoagulant treatment is influenced by both the treatment and the patient's baseline risk, which is often disregarded.
To determine the excess bleeding risk in venous thromboembolism (VTE) cases during initial (0 to 6 months) and extended (6 months to 5 years) treatment compared to matched population controls without VTE or anticoagulant treatment, overall, and stratified by sex and age.
Cancer-free patients with VTE treated with direct oral anticoagulants from 2014 to 2020, along with propensity score-matched controls, were identified from nationwide Swedish registers. Excess risk of major bleeding was assessed using the incidence rate difference (IRD) calculated by subtracting the control bleeding rate from the case bleeding rate.
The matched cohort comprised 36,115 VTE cases and 36,115 controls. During initial treatment, 388 VTE cases (1.07%) and 103 controls (0.29%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 2.19 (95% confidence interval 1.89-2.49) per 100 person-years. Following rematching at 6 months, 139 cases (0.70%) and 214 controls (1.08%) experienced bleeding, IRD: 0.70 (0.52-0.89). During initial treatment, females had a higher excess bleeding risk than males, with male IRD: 1.73 (1.34-2.12) and female IRD: 2.69 (2.23-3.15). Excess bleeding risk was highest in the oldest patient population. In extended treatment, excess bleeding was not dependent on sex-male IRD: 0.60 (0.35-0.85), female IRD: 0.81 (0.54-1.08)-and did not increase with age.
The excess bleeding risk from anticoagulant treatment was high during initial treatment, particularly among females and the elderly, but lower and not influenced by sex or age during extended treatment.
抗凝治疗导致大出血的风险受治疗方法和患者基线风险的影响,但后者常被忽视。
确定与无静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)或抗凝治疗的匹配人群对照组相比,VTE患者在初始治疗(0至6个月)和延长治疗(6个月至5年)期间大出血的额外风险,总体情况以及按性别和年龄分层的情况。
从瑞典全国登记处识别出2014年至2020年接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的无癌症VTE患者以及倾向评分匹配的对照组。使用病例出血率减去对照出血率计算出的发病率差异(IRD)来评估大出血的额外风险。
匹配队列包括36115例VTE病例和36115名对照。在初始治疗期间,388例VTE病例(1.07%)和103名对照(0.29%)发生出血,IRD为每100人年2.19(95%置信区间1.89 - 2.49)。在6个月重新匹配后,139例病例(0.70%)和214名对照(1.08%)发生出血,IRD为0.70(0.52 - 0.89)。在初始治疗期间,女性大出血的额外风险高于男性,男性IRD为1.73(1.34 - 2.12),女性IRD为2.69(2.23 - 3.15)。大出血风险在年龄最大的患者群体中最高。在延长治疗期间,大出血风险不依赖于性别——男性IRD为0.60(0.35 - 0.85),女性IRD为0.81(0.54 - 1.08)——且不随年龄增加。
抗凝治疗的大出血额外风险在初始治疗期间较高,尤其是在女性和老年人中,但在延长治疗期间较低且不受性别或年龄影响。