Manjunathan Kangan, Bavle Radhika Manoj, Menon Mrinalini, Venugopal Reshma, Makarla Soumya, Nair Sankha
Department of Biotechnology, Sir M Visvesvaraya Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2024 Oct-Dec;28(4):725-730. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_137_24. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
The important tenet of forensic science is personal identification based on DNA studies. The use of DNA has changed the specificity and sensitivity of victim identity tests associated with criminology, trauma, and natural disasters in Forensic Science. Blood is a proven source of DNA quantification for these analyses. The use of saliva, which can be acquired more easily in a simple and atraumatic method is gaining preference; as some of its advantages include - collection of larger sample numbers, easy replication of tests in duplicates and triplicates, and repetitions if advocated, can easily be performed. Though it yields a comparatively slightly lesser quantity of DNA, some of the samples - like dried blood and blood-tinged saliva, have the potential to be used in forensic sciences and provide a better result than simple saliva. Such samples are valuable sources of genetic material that can be utilized in crime and forensic investigations. The present study is one of few studies to be explored in this sphere as very few studies using blood-tinged saliva and dried blood have been conducted so far.
To determine if blood-tinged saliva or dried blood yields a good amount of DNA. To compare it with fresh blood samples for authentication.
The study groups: Group A - = 20 normal blood samples, Group B - = 20 of saliva-tinged blood samples and Group C - Dried Blood samples from the same subjects. DNA was isolated from these 60 samples using Xplorogen DNA isolation and extraction kit. The quality and quantity of DNA isolation were determined using a spectrophotometric technique using a Biospectrometer.
The extracted DNA was quantified and the yield was 83.3 ± 9.4, 55.1 ± 7.4, and 73.4 ± 8.7 μg/ml in fresh blood, dried blood, and blood-tinged saliva, respectively. Out of the 60 samples assessed, all 100% samples yielded a sufficiently good DNA content. Extraction from Blood tinged with saliva showed promising results when compared to dried blood and the levels obtained were closely comparable to whole blood (fresh).
Blood is a standard sample for ample DNA yields in forensic studies. We conclude in this study, that blood-tinged saliva gives an equally good sample for utilization in DNA detection in those situations where such samples are traced (even at a later date) at the scene of crime, or mass disasters for forensic analysis.
法医学的重要原则是基于DNA研究进行个人识别。DNA的使用改变了法医学中与犯罪学、创伤和自然灾害相关的受害者身份鉴定测试的特异性和敏感性。血液是这些分析中已证实的DNA定量来源。唾液的使用正越来越受到青睐,因为它可以通过简单且无创的方法更轻松地获取;其一些优点包括——可以采集更多样本,测试易于重复进行(一式两份和一式三份),如果需要重复测试也很容易操作。尽管唾液产生的DNA数量相对略少,但一些样本——如干血和带血唾液,有可能用于法医学,并且比单纯唾液能提供更好的结果。这些样本是可用于犯罪和法医调查的宝贵遗传物质来源。本研究是该领域为数不多的研究之一,因为到目前为止,很少有使用带血唾液和干血的研究。
确定带血唾液或干血是否能产生大量DNA。将其与新鲜血液样本进行比较以进行鉴定。
研究组:A组——20份正常血液样本,B组——20份带血唾液样本,C组——来自同一受试者的干血样本。使用Xplorogen DNA分离提取试剂盒从这60个样本中分离DNA。使用生物光谱仪通过分光光度技术确定DNA分离的质量和数量。
对提取的DNA进行定量,新鲜血液、干血和带血唾液中的产量分别为83.3±9.4、55.1±7.4和73.4±8.7μg/ml。在评估的60个样本中,所有样本(100%)都产生了足够好的DNA含量。与干血相比,从带血唾液中提取显示出有前景的结果,获得的水平与全血(新鲜)密切可比。
在法医研究中,血液是产生大量DNA的标准样本。我们在本研究中得出结论,在犯罪现场或大规模灾难现场追踪到此类样本(即使是在稍后日期)用于法医分析的情况下,带血唾液可为DNA检测提供同样良好的样本。