Zhang Pengfei, Berk Thomas
Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Neura Health, New York, NY, United States.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 30;16:1526037. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1526037. eCollection 2025.
The International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3), significantly influences clinicians' understanding of headache disorders. In this study, we aim to elucidate how the hierarchical structure of ICHD-3 shapes the understanding of interconnectivity among headache disorders.
A network comprises elements known as "nodes," with the connections between them referred to as "edges." In our study, a node represents a headache diagnosis that meets at least one ICHD-3 diagnostic criterion of the ICHD-3. We developed two network models for ICHD-3: a non-hierarchical model, where edges are only formed by cross-references found within the text of diagnoses, and a hierarchical model that incorporates the ICHD-3's structural organization by adding extra edges between sections and their subsections. We identified the top 10 disorders in terms of their centrality, which assesses their popularity, their role as bridges in the network, and their proximity to other disorders. These measurements are calculated using the network's degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality.
Both our models contain 387 nodes. The choice between a non-hierarchical or hierarchical model affects which diagnoses occupy the top 10 centrality nodes. In both models, migraine and medication-overuse headaches consistently rank among the top 10 diagnoses according to all three centrality metrics. The hierarchical model includes a greater number of secondary headache diagnoses among its top 10 compared to the non-hierarchical model.
Migraine and medication overuse headaches are the most interconnected nodes in ICHD-3. The addition of a diagnostic hierarchy facilitates the unification of secondary headaches, which would otherwise be considered isolated, miscellaneous diagnoses. When interconnected hierarchically, these secondary headache diagnoses become the majority of the most well-connected nodes in our field.
《国际头痛疾病分类第三版》(ICHD - 3)对临床医生理解头痛疾病有重大影响。在本研究中,我们旨在阐明ICHD - 3的层次结构如何塑造对头痛疾病之间相互联系的理解。
网络由被称为“节点”的元素组成,它们之间的连接被称为“边”。在我们的研究中,一个节点代表符合ICHD - 3至少一项诊断标准的头痛诊断。我们为ICHD - 3开发了两种网络模型:一种是非层次模型,其中边仅由诊断文本中发现的交叉引用形成;另一种是层次模型,通过在各章节及其子章节之间添加额外的边来纳入ICHD - 3的结构组织。我们根据中心性确定了排名前十的疾病,中心性评估了它们的流行程度、在网络中作为桥梁的作用以及与其他疾病的接近程度。这些测量是使用网络的度中心性、介数中心性和紧密中心性来计算的。
我们的两个模型都包含387个节点。非层次模型或层次模型的选择会影响哪些诊断占据排名前十的中心性节点。在两个模型中,偏头痛和药物过量使用性头痛在所有三个中心性指标中始终位列排名前十的诊断之中。与非层次模型相比,层次模型在其排名前十的诊断中包含更多的继发性头痛诊断。
偏头痛和药物过量使用性头痛是ICHD - 3中相互联系最紧密的节点。诊断层次结构的加入有助于统一继发性头痛,否则这些继发性头痛会被视为孤立的、混杂的诊断。当按层次相互联系时,这些继发性头痛诊断成为我们领域中连接最紧密的大多数节点。