Smith T W, Houston B K, Stucky R J
Biol Psychol. 1985 Feb;20(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(85)90039-0.
Previous research has evaluated finger pulse volume (FPV) as a psychophysiological measure and found it to reflect anxiety, orienting, effort and anger. Controllable versus uncontrollable threats have been found to have different effects on cardiovascular parameters, including pulse rate (PR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). To date, no studies have compared the effects of such coping efforts on FPV with their effects on PR and SBP. The present study examined the response of PR, SBP and FPV to conditions of controllable shock, uncontrollable shock and no shock. As expected, SBP and PR measures were elevated in the controllable as compared to uncontrollable shock conditions, replicating previous work on cardiovascular responses to coping demands. In contrast, FPV was sensitive to the threat of shock, but did not differ as a function of the coping demands of the task. The findings were discussed in terms of the interpretation of FPV as a psychophysiological measure.
先前的研究已将手指脉搏容积(FPV)作为一种心理生理指标进行评估,并发现它能反映焦虑、定向、努力和愤怒情绪。研究发现,可控威胁与不可控威胁对心血管参数(包括脉搏率(PR)和收缩压(SBP))有不同影响。迄今为止,尚无研究比较此类应对努力对FPV的影响及其对PR和SBP的影响。本研究考察了PR、SBP和FPV在可控电击、不可控电击和无电击条件下的反应。正如预期的那样,与不可控电击条件相比,可控电击条件下的SBP和PR测量值升高,这重复了先前关于心血管对应对需求反应的研究。相比之下,FPV对电击威胁敏感,但并未因任务的应对需求而有所不同。研究结果从将FPV解释为心理生理指标的角度进行了讨论。