Kolner S J, Welch E C
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1985 Apr;73(2):121-31.
In its search for an objective overall diagnostic evaluation, the University of Illinois Library of the Health Sciences' Program Evaluation Committee selected a book availability measure; it is easy to administer and repeat, results are reproducible, and comparable data exist for other academic and health sciences libraries. The study followed the standard methodology in the literature with minor modifications. Patrons searching for particular books were asked to record item(s) needed and the outcome of the search. Library staff members then determined the reasons for failures in obtaining desired items. The results of the study are five performance scores. The first four represent the percentage probability of a library's operating with ideal effectiveness; the last provides an overall performance score. The scores of the Library of the Health Sciences demonstrated no unusual availability problems. The study was easy to implement and provided meaningful, quantitative, and objective data.
为了寻求客观的整体诊断评估,伊利诺伊大学健康科学图书馆的项目评估委员会选择了一项图书可获取性衡量标准;该标准易于实施和重复,结果具有可重复性,并且其他学术和健康科学图书馆也存在可比数据。该研究遵循了文献中的标准方法,并做了一些小的修改。要求寻找特定书籍的读者记录所需书目及搜索结果。图书馆工作人员随后确定未能获取所需书目的原因。研究结果是五个绩效分数。前四个代表图书馆以理想效率运营的百分比概率;最后一个提供整体绩效分数。健康科学图书馆的分数表明不存在异常的可获取性问题。该研究易于实施,并提供了有意义、定量和客观的数据。