Anzion Lily Joanne, Schaafsma Frederieke G, Boot Cécile R L, Formanoy Margriet A G, Schelvis Roosmarijn M C
Department of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):623. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21702-x.
There is a growing awareness for addressing mental health in the workplace. Although interventions to promote mental health at the organizational-level exist, implementation is a challenge. Middle management can play a crucial role in implementing organisational-level interventions. Also, we know that mental models often need to change first, before enactment of such interventions occur. The aim of this study is therefore to better understand whether and how changes in mental models of middle managers are associated with the implementation activities of an organisational-level intervention to support mental health. Ultimately, this is meant to lead to the enactment of, in this case, a dialogue tool to normalize a conversation between middle manager and employee to enhance mental health.
Participatory Action Research was used as a method to design our implementation of a dialogue tool primarily focused on middle management to address mental in health in one SME company with 238 employees. In-depth interviews with 11 (middle) managers at the start of the implementation phase were held. After nine months, 9 out of the same 11 (middle) managers were interviewed again to gain understanding whether and how changes occurred during the implementation. Thematic analysis was applied to the interviews, from inductive and deductive perspective. Focus groups with employees and observations during the implementation activities were used for triangulation purposes.
The mental models of the (middle) managers were analyzed based on readiness for change, perceived challenges and perceived opportunities. These mental models were generally positive towards the project, despite the low trust towards the Top Management and the general lack of experience with addressing mental health at the workplace. Nine months later, mental models changed towards more awareness and engagement in addressing mental health. Also, enactment of the dialogue tool by middle management and employees occurred. An association of these changes with, for example, the frequency and pace of implementation activities in which all employees were involved was reported.
To implement interventions addressing mental health at the workplace, taking the time and using implementation activities that match the needs of middle management might help to change mental models of (middle) management.
人们越来越意识到需要在工作场所解决心理健康问题。尽管存在促进组织层面心理健康的干预措施,但实施起来是一项挑战。中层管理人员在实施组织层面的干预措施中可以发挥关键作用。此外,我们知道在实施此类干预措施之前,思维模式通常需要先发生改变。因此,本研究的目的是更好地了解中层管理人员的思维模式变化是否以及如何与支持心理健康的组织层面干预措施的实施活动相关联。最终,这旨在促成在这种情况下一种对话工具的颁布,以使中层管理人员与员工之间的对话常态化,从而促进心理健康。
参与式行动研究被用作一种方法,来设计我们在一家拥有238名员工的中小企业中实施的一种主要针对中层管理人员的对话工具,以解决心理健康问题。在实施阶段开始时,对11名(中层)管理人员进行了深入访谈。九个月后,再次对这11名(中层)管理人员中的9名进行访谈,以了解在实施过程中是否以及如何发生了变化。从归纳和演绎的角度对访谈进行了主题分析。与员工进行焦点小组讨论以及在实施活动期间进行观察,用于三角互证。
基于对变革的准备程度、感知到的挑战和感知到的机会,对(中层)管理人员的思维模式进行了分析。尽管对高层管理人员信任度较低且普遍缺乏在工作场所解决心理健康问题的经验,但这些思维模式总体上对该项目持积极态度。九个月后,思维模式转变为对解决心理健康问题有了更多的认识和参与度。此外,中层管理人员和员工颁布了对话工具。报告了这些变化与例如所有员工都参与的实施活动的频率和节奏之间的关联。
为了在工作场所实施解决心理健康问题的干预措施,花时间并使用符合中层管理人员需求的实施活动可能有助于改变(中层)管理人员的思维模式。