Cai Wenji, Dubreuil Nadia, Abu Nada Lina, Zhou Wen Bo Sam, Basiri Tayebeh, Hadad Amir, Charde Priti, Ducret Maxime, Tamimi Faleh
Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cégep Garneau, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Apr;52(4):612-621. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14142. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
Dental calculus accumulation varies across individuals. While various factors contribute to its accumulation, the role of salivary composition remains underexplored. This study aims to compare individuals suffering from rapid rates of dental calculus formation rates with those having slow formation rates in terms of salivary electrochemical properties as well as its proteomic, metaproteomic and elemental composition.
A total of 26 patients with a history of dental calculus were recruited. Saliva samples were collected and evaluated for electrochemical properties as well as elemental, proteomic and metaproteomic composition. Patients were provided scaling treatment to remove all calculus. Six months after the dental cleaning patients were re-assessed for the presence of dental calculus. Based on the dental calculus formation rate participants were categorised into slow (57.7%) and rapid calculus formers (42.3%) that were then assessed for differences in salivary composition.
Rapid calculus formers exhibited a more neutral zeta-potential and lower concentration of salivary calcium ions than their slow-forming counterparts. Proteomic analysis identified 895 proteins across all samples. Of these, 38 proteins were exclusive to the rapid formation group, while 24 proteins were specific to the slow group. The rapid group demonstrated augmented pathways related to cell binding (e.g., cytoskeletal regulation by Rho GTPase and integrin signalling), inflammatory mediation (e.g., chemokine and cytokine signalling) and neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., 5-Hydroxytryptamine degradation, Huntington's disease and Parkinson's disease) and significant enrichment in peptidase inhibitor activity. In contrast, the slow group demonstrated enrichment mainly in immune response. Metaproteomic analysis for salivary bacteria showed significant predominance of Streptococci in the rapid group and elevated levels of Rothia in the slow group.
The saliva of patients with rapid calculus formation rates differs from that of patients with slow rates of calculus formation in terms of electrochemical properties as well as proteomic, metaproteomic and elemental composition.
牙结石的积累在个体间存在差异。虽然多种因素会导致牙结石的积累,但唾液成分的作用仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在比较牙结石形成速度快的个体与形成速度慢的个体在唾液电化学性质、蛋白质组学、宏蛋白质组学和元素组成方面的差异。
共招募了26名有牙结石病史的患者。收集唾液样本并评估其电化学性质以及元素、蛋白质组学和宏蛋白质组学组成。为患者进行洗牙治疗以清除所有牙结石。洗牙6个月后,对患者牙结石的存在情况进行重新评估。根据牙结石形成速度,将参与者分为慢形成组(57.7%)和快形成组(42.3%),然后评估两组唾液成分的差异。
与慢形成组相比,快形成组的zeta电位更中性,唾液钙离子浓度更低。蛋白质组学分析在所有样本中鉴定出895种蛋白质。其中,38种蛋白质是快形成组特有的,而24种蛋白质是慢形成组特有的。快形成组显示出与细胞黏附相关的增强途径(如Rho GTPase对细胞骨架的调节和整合素信号传导)、炎症介导(如趋化因子和细胞因子信号传导)和神经退行性疾病(如5-羟色胺降解、亨廷顿舞蹈病和帕金森病),并且肽酶抑制剂活性显著富集。相比之下,慢形成组主要在免疫反应方面富集。唾液细菌的宏蛋白质组学分析显示,快形成组中链球菌显著占优势,慢形成组中罗氏菌水平升高。
牙结石形成速度快的患者与形成速度慢的患者相比,其唾液在电化学性质、蛋白质组学、宏蛋白质组学和元素组成方面存在差异。