• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用预先确定的变更控制计划以实现作为医疗设备的软件新版本的发布。

The use of predetermined change control plans to enable the release of new versions of software as a medical device.

作者信息

DuPreez Jacques Andre, McDermott Olivia

机构信息

College of Science & Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2025 Mar;22(3):261-275. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787
PMID:39961588
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates how Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs) can support the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) of certain Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).

METHODS

Targeted surveys collected qualitative and quantitative data on the current regulatory change process for SaMD; the use of PCCPs; the potential parameters of PCCPs in terms of technical, clinical, usability, and administrative changes to SaMD; and whether PCCPs could be used more broadly for all SaMDs.

RESULTS

Results indicate that the current regulatory approach is not fit for purpose, specifically regarding fast-moving SaMD or continuous-learning AI SaMD. There was strong support for PCCPs to cover device technology, usability, and administrative changes, while clinical changes had limited support and required further investigation. The EU lags behind the US and now the UK in addressing these challenges and should look to legislate and implement PCCPs to ensure ongoing innovation and investment in digital health technologies.

CONCLUSION

This work is novel in the gathering of meaningful input from experts, practitioners, and regulatory professionals within the SaMD industry located in the EU, UK, and US on the value and need for PCCPs. This study has implications for practice and policy as it can inform SaMD guidance and legislation.

摘要

目标

本研究调查预定变更控制计划(PCCP)如何支持某些作为医疗器械的软件(SaMD)的软件开发生命周期(SDLC)。

方法

有针对性的调查收集了关于SaMD当前监管变更流程的定性和定量数据;PCCP的使用情况;PCCP在SaMD技术、临床、可用性和管理变更方面的潜在参数;以及PCCP是否可更广泛地应用于所有SaMD。

结果

结果表明,当前的监管方法不适用,特别是对于快速发展的SaMD或持续学习的人工智能SaMD。对于PCCP涵盖设备技术、可用性和管理变更有强烈支持,而临床变更的支持有限,需要进一步调查。在应对这些挑战方面,欧盟落后于美国,现在也落后于英国,应考虑立法并实施PCCP,以确保对数字健康技术的持续创新和投资。

结论

这项工作的新颖之处在于从欧盟、英国和美国的SaMD行业内的专家、从业者和监管专业人员那里收集了关于PCCP的价值和需求的有意义的意见。本研究对实践和政策有影响,因为它可为SaMD指南和立法提供参考。

相似文献

1
The use of predetermined change control plans to enable the release of new versions of software as a medical device.使用预先确定的变更控制计划以实现作为医疗设备的软件新版本的发布。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2025 Mar;22(3):261-275. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
Innovation Process and Industrial System of US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Software as a Medical Device: Review and Content Analysis.美国食品和药物管理局批准的软件作为医疗器械的创新过程和工业体系:综述与内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 24;25:e47505. doi: 10.2196/47505.
3
Changes in software as a medical device based on artificial intelligence technologies.人工智能技术驱动的软件医疗器械的变化。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022 Oct;17(10):1969-1977. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02669-1. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
4
Artificial Intelligence-Based Software as a Medical Device (AI-SaMD): A Systematic Review.基于人工智能的软件作为医疗器械(AI-SaMD):一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 3;13(7):817. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070817.
5
Methodology for Conducting Post-Marketing Surveillance of Software as a Medical Device Based on Artificial Intelligence Technologies.基于人工智能技术的医疗器械软件上市后监测方法学。
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2022;14(5):15-23. doi: 10.17691/stm2022.14.5.02. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Clinical Simulation in the Regulation of Software as a Medical Device: An eDelphi Study.作为医疗器械的软件监管中的临床模拟:一项电子德尔菲研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 25;8:e56241. doi: 10.2196/56241.
7
Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device.技术赋能、证据驱动且以患者为中心:将软件作为医疗器械进行监管的未来之路。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e34038. doi: 10.2196/34038.
8
Minimum labelling requirements for dermatology artificial intelligence-based Software as Medical Device (SaMD): A consensus statement.基于人工智能的皮肤病学医疗器械软件(SaMD)的最低标签要求:共识声明。
Australas J Dermatol. 2024 May;65(3):e21-e29. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14222. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Advancements in Clinical Evaluation and Regulatory Frameworks for AI-Driven Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).人工智能驱动的医疗器械软件(SaMD)临床评估与监管框架的进展。
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2024 Oct 23;6:147-151. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3485534. eCollection 2025.
10
Benchmarking the clinical outcomes of Healthentia SaMD in chronic disease management: a systematic literature review comparison.比较Healthentia软件即服务(SaMD)在慢性病管理中的临床结果:一项系统文献综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 24;12:1488687. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488687. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming regulatory barriers to the implementation of AI agents in healthcare.克服医疗保健领域人工智能代理实施过程中的监管障碍。
Nat Med. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03841-1.