Zhang Dandan, Xiong Xingyu, Ding Hexiao, He Xiaole, Li Huan, Yao Yuzhi, Ma Ruisi, Liu Ting
Sun Yat-sen University, School of Nursing, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Mar;163:104997. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.104997. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Despite advances in cancer treatment that have improved survival rates among patients with breast cancer, they are at high risk of developing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, which typically manifests as heart failure. Although exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness in these patients, its effectiveness in preventing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction remains unclear.
To assess the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions using cardiac function parameters and to identify the optimal exercise modality for preventing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction.
A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, covering all records from their inception through August 6, 2024. Studies that used exercise-based interventions, either exercise alone or with other interventions, were included. Those with insufficient data for the primary and secondary outcomes were excluded. Quality appraisal was evaluated using the risk of bias tool (RoB-2). All statistical analyses were conducted using the meta (version 7.0-0) and gemtc (version 1.0-2) packages in R software (version 4.3.3). For continuous outcomes, pairwise and network meta-analysis were employed to estimate mean differences (MDs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was employed to rank treatments. The study protocol has been registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024501160).
In total, 13 randomized controlled trials involving 1122 participants were included in the review. There was low-to-high risk of bias across thirteen studies. Compared to usual care, exercise-based interventions significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (MD, 1.68; 95 % CI, 0.59-2.77) and global longitudinal strain (MD, 1.40; 95 % CI, 0.59-2.21). Based on the ranking probabilities, combined aerobic and resistance exercise was the most efficacious method for improving left ventricular ejection fraction (four studies; SUCRA, 0.96), followed by exercise-based cardio-oncology rehabilitation (two studies; SUCRA, 0.45) and aerobic exercise (four studies; SUCRA, 0.42). In terms of improving global longitudinal strain, combined aerobic and resistance exercise also ranked highest (three studies; SUCRA, 0.88). However, exercise-based cardio-oncology rehabilitation (two studies; SUCRA, 0.47) and aerobic exercise (one study; SUCRA, 0.45) were less effective.
This network meta-analysis showed very low certainty for the prospective efficacy of exercise-based interventions, especially the combined aerobic and resistance exercise, in preventing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction. Further rigorous studies are required to confirm the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions in preventing cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction among patients with breast cancer.
尽管癌症治疗取得了进展,提高了乳腺癌患者的生存率,但他们仍面临着发生癌症治疗相关心脏功能障碍的高风险,这种障碍通常表现为心力衰竭。尽管运动可以改善这些患者的心肺功能,但运动在预防癌症治疗相关心脏功能障碍方面的有效性仍不明确。
使用心脏功能参数评估基于运动的干预措施的有效性,并确定预防癌症治疗相关心脏功能障碍的最佳运动方式。
系统评价和网状Meta分析。
对PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行全面检索,涵盖从建库至2024年8月6日的所有记录。纳入使用基于运动的干预措施的研究,这些干预措施可以是单独运动或与其他干预措施联合使用。排除主要和次要结局数据不足的研究。使用偏倚风险工具(RoB-2)进行质量评估。所有统计分析均使用R软件(版本4.3.3)中的meta(版本7.0-0)和gemtc(版本1.0-2)软件包进行。对于连续性结局,采用成对和网状Meta分析来估计平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)对治疗进行排序。该研究方案已在PROSPERO上注册(注册号:CRD42024501160)。
该评价共纳入13项随机对照试验,涉及1122名参与者。13项研究的偏倚风险为低到高。与常规护理相比,基于运动的干预措施显著改善了左心室射血分数(MD,1.68;95%CI,0.59-2.77)和整体纵向应变(MD,1.40;95%CI,0.