Suppr超能文献

PACPN的开发与验证:家长对哭泣的儿科医生和儿科护士的态度调查问卷

Development and validation of the PACPN: Parents' Attitudes Towards Crying Pediatricians and pediatric Nurses questionnaire.

作者信息

Foijer M, Spek B, de Vos M A, Verhagen A A E, Aris-Meijer J L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Feb 17;184(3):203. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06030-x.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Crying by healthcare professionals in the medical setting is a common but understudied phenomenon. We aimed to develop a questionnaire which measures the attitudes of parent towards crying pediatricians and pediatric nurses. We assessed reliability and validity in a group of parents of children who are living with, have died from or survived a life-limiting or life-threatening-condition. The development of the PACPN was based on modification of an existing questionnaire and expert input. In a cross-sectional-design, we assessed reliability and validity for both pediatricians and pediatric nurses. Dimensionality was assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). Cronbach's alphas were calculated for each subscale. For construct validity, participants were asked to rate an additional question regarding the goal to measure parents' attitudes towards crying pediatricians/pediatric nurses. We hypothesized that a higher score would have a strong positive correlation with the total score of the PACPN. At the end of the questionnaire, participants were asked to rate and comment the completeness. The developed 25-item questionnaire was completed by 116 parents. The PCA revealed two dimensions: (1) family's circumstances; (2) personal circumstances of the pediatrician/pediatric nurse. Internal consistency was good (pediatricians, .81-.93; pediatric nurses, .83-.93). The hypothesis regarding construct validity was confirmed (Spearman's rho = .71-.75). The completeness score was 7.7 (min-max 1-10, SD = 1.51).

CONCLUSION

The PACPN showed good internal consistency and some degree of construct validity. We assume that by adding some items with nuance to the situation and the degree of crying the completeness of the questionnaire will improve.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Crying by HCPs in the medical setting, such as the hospital is common but HCPs have different attitudes towards this. • A questionnaire on crying physicians and nurses is available for assessing HCPs attitudes.

WHAT IS NEW

• The PACPN questionnaire is a simple tool for assessing parents' attitudes towards crying pediatricians and pediatric nurses. • The PACPN showed good internal consistency and some degree of construct validity.

摘要

未加标注

医护人员在医疗环境中的哭泣是一种常见但研究不足的现象。我们旨在开发一份问卷,以衡量家长对哭泣的儿科医生和儿科护士的态度。我们在一组孩子患有、死于或幸存于危及生命或生命受限疾病的家长中评估了该问卷的信度和效度。儿科医护人员哭泣态度问卷(PACPN)的开发基于对现有问卷的修改和专家意见。在横断面设计中,我们评估了该问卷对儿科医生和儿科护士的信度和效度。使用主成分分析(PCA)评估维度。计算每个子量表的克朗巴哈系数。为了验证结构效度,要求参与者对另一个关于衡量家长对哭泣的儿科医生/儿科护士态度目标的问题进行评分。我们假设较高的分数与PACPN总分有很强的正相关。在问卷结尾,要求参与者对问卷的完整性进行评分和评论。116位家长完成了这份由25个项目组成的问卷。主成分分析揭示了两个维度:(1)家庭情况;(2)儿科医生/儿科护士的个人情况。内部一致性良好(儿科医生,0.81 - 0.93;儿科护士,0.83 - 0.93)。关于结构效度的假设得到证实(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数 = 0.71 - 0.75)。完整性得分是7.7(最小值 - 最大值1 - 10,标准差 = 1.51)。

结论

PACPN显示出良好的内部一致性和一定程度的结构效度。我们认为,通过增加一些关于哭泣情境和程度的细微差别项目,问卷的完整性将会提高。

已知信息

• 医护人员在医院等医疗环境中的哭泣很常见,但医护人员对此有不同态度。• 有一份关于哭泣医生和护士的问卷可用于评估医护人员的态度。

新内容

• PACPN问卷是一种用于评估家长对哭泣的儿科医生和儿科护士态度的简单工具。• PACPN显示出良好的内部一致性和一定程度的结构效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/974d/11832691/c7737c9bdf07/431_2025_6030_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验