• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者护理团队对高血压患者血压控制的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Impact of patient care teams on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Akasaki Yuichi, Suematsu Yasunori, Azushima Kengo, Shiga Yuhei, Sakima Atsushi, Satoh Michihiro, Arima Hisatomi, Hirawa Nobuhito

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Hypertension, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02152-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41440-025-02152-9
PMID:39962166
Abstract

Hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, with its global prevalence doubling over the past three decades. Despite advancements in antihypertensive therapies, approximately 50% of patients with hypertension fail to achieve their target blood pressure (BP) levels, underscoring the need for innovative care strategies. Patient care teams comprising multidisciplinary healthcare providers have shown promise in improving BP management. This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of patient care teams involving physicians in hypertension management. To this end, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and IchuShi-Web were comprehensively searched and 61 randomized controlled trials including 64,857 participants were identified. Compared with usual care, interventions by patient care teams significantly reduced office systolic BP (mean difference: -6.31 mmHg; 95% confidence interval: -7.71 to -4.90) and decreased the risk of uncontrolled BP by 27% (risk ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.79). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent BP reductions across various team leadership roles, such as physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, and across different intervention durations. These findings highlight the effectiveness of team-based BP management in achieving improved BP control, regardless of team composition or the follow-up period. Multidisciplinary care offers a viable approach to addressing the unmet needs of patients with hypertension, potentially improving cardiovascular outcomes. This evidence supports integrating patient care teams into hypertension management, particularly in settings requiring physician oversight. Future research should focus on refining team structures and tailoring interventions to diverse healthcare environments to enhance their impact.

摘要

高血压是心血管疾病的一个重要危险因素,在过去三十年中其全球患病率翻了一番。尽管抗高血压治疗取得了进展,但仍有大约50%的高血压患者未能达到其目标血压水平,这凸显了创新护理策略的必要性。由多学科医疗服务提供者组成的患者护理团队在改善血压管理方面已显示出前景。这项系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估有医生参与的患者护理团队在高血压管理中的有效性。为此,全面检索了PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL和IchuShi-Web,共识别出61项随机对照试验,涉及64,857名参与者。与常规护理相比,患者护理团队的干预措施显著降低了诊室收缩压(平均差值:-6.31 mmHg;95%置信区间:-7.71至-4.90),并将血压未得到控制的风险降低了27%(风险比:0.73;95%置信区间:0.68 - 0.79)。亚组分析表明,在不同的团队领导角色(如医生、护士和药剂师)以及不同的干预持续时间内,血压均持续降低。这些发现凸显了基于团队的血压管理在实现更好的血压控制方面的有效性,无论团队组成或随访期如何。多学科护理为满足高血压患者未得到满足的需求提供了一种可行的方法,有可能改善心血管结局。这一证据支持将患者护理团队纳入高血压管理,尤其是在需要医生监督的环境中。未来的研究应侧重于优化团队结构,并针对不同的医疗环境调整干预措施,以增强其影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of patient care teams on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.患者护理团队对高血压患者血压控制的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02152-9.
2
Team-based care for improving hypertension management among outpatients (TBC-HTA): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.基于团队的门诊高血压管理护理(TBC-HTA):一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0472-y.
3
Effectiveness of digital health interventions for telemedicine/telehealth for managing blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.数字健康干预对成人高血压远程医疗管理的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb;48(2):478-491. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01792-7. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.社区与慢性病护理模式协同团队干预与常规护理对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者收缩压的影响:SUCCEED随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36227.
5
Effectiveness of team-based care interventions in improving blood pressure outcomes among adults with hypertension in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于团队的护理干预对改善非洲高血压成人患者血压结果的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 17;14(7):e080987. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080987.
6
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Effect of population-based sodium reduction interventions on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.基于人群的减钠干预措施对血压的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hypertens Res. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02181-4.
8
Primary care-based, pharmacist-physician collaborative medication-therapy management of hypertension: a randomized, pragmatic trial.基于初级保健的药剂师-医生协作高血压药物治疗管理:一项随机实用试验。
Clin Ther. 2014 Sep 1;36(9):1244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.030. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Group-delivered interventions for lowering blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于降低高血压患者血压的群体干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Mar 27;75(753):e266-e276. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0585. Print 2025 Apr.
10
Improving blood pressure control through pharmacist interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.通过药剂师干预改善血压控制:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Apr 10;3(2):e000718. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000718.

引用本文的文献

1
Key highlights of the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).日本高血压学会《2025年高血压及血压升高管理指南》(JSH2025)的关键要点。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02331-8.
2
The JSH Morning Hypertension Eradication Program Project.日本高血压学会晨间高血压根除项目
Hypertens Res. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02330-9.
3
JSH2025 guidelines new viewpoints.JSH2025指南新观点。

本文引用的文献

1
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension.2024年欧洲心脏病学会高血压管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2024 Oct 7;45(38):3912-4018. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae178.
2
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3
Optimizing Hypertension Treatment in Older Patients Through Home Blood Pressure Monitoring by Pharmacists in Primary Care: The MINOR Clinical Trial.
Hypertens Res. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02296-8.
通过初级保健药师进行家庭血压监测优化老年高血压患者的治疗:MINOR 临床试验。
Clin Ther. 2023 Oct;45(10):941-946. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
4
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Team-Based Care for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis and Simulation Study.基于团队的高血压护理的有效性和成本效益:一项荟萃分析和模拟研究。
Hypertension. 2023 Jun;80(6):1199-1208. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20292. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (CRHCP): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial.非医师社区卫生保健提供者主导的强化血压干预与常规护理对心血管疾病的效果(CRHCP):一项开放标签、盲终点、群组随机试验。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):928-938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02603-4. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Impact of medication therapy management (MTM) service model on multi-morbidity (MMD) patients with hypertension: a pilot RCT.药物治疗管理 (MTM) 服务模式对高血压多种疾病 (MMD) 患者的影响:一项先导 RCT 研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03725-4.
7
Pharmacist interventions to improve blood pressure control in primary care: a cluster randomised trial.药剂师干预措施改善基层医疗中血压控制情况:一项整群随机试验
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Feb;45(1):126-136. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01452-1. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
8
Comparing Pharmacist-Led Telehealth Care and Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure: The Hyperlink 3 Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial.比较药师主导的远程医疗护理和基于诊所的护理对高血压控制不佳的效果:Hyperlink 3 实用集群随机试验。
Hypertension. 2022 Dec;79(12):2708-2720. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19816. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
Integration of a multicomponent intervention for hypertension into primary healthcare services in Singapore-A cluster randomized controlled trial.将一项多组分干预措施整合到新加坡初级医疗保健服务中以治疗高血压-一项群组随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jun 13;19(6):e1004026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004026. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Efficacy of Pharmaceutical Care in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial.药学服务对 2 型糖尿病合并高血压患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Mar 24;2022:7681404. doi: 10.1155/2022/7681404. eCollection 2022.