Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
PLoS Med. 2022 Jun 13;19(6):e1004026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004026. eCollection 2022 Jun.
Despite availability of clinical practice guidelines for hypertension management, blood pressure (BP) control remains sub-optimal (<30%) even in high-income countries. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a potentially scalable multicomponent intervention integrated into primary care system compared to usual care on BP control.
A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 8 government clinics in Singapore. The trial enrolled 916 patients aged ≥40 years with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg). Multicomponent intervention consisted of physician training in risk-based treatment of hypertension, subsidized losartan-HCTZ single-pill combination (SPC) medications, nurse training in motivational conversations (MCs), and telephone follow-ups. Usual care (controls) comprised of routine care in the clinics, no MC or telephone follow-ups, and no subsidy on SPCs. The primary outcome was mean SBP at 24 months' post-baseline. Four clinics (447 patients) were randomized to intervention and 4 (469) to usual care. Patient enrolment commenced in January 2017, and follow-up was during December 2018 to September 2020. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles. The primary outcome was SBP at 24 months. BP at baseline, 12 and 24 months was modeled at the patient level in a likelihood-based, linear mixed model repeated measures analysis with treatment group, follow-up, treatment group × follow-up interaction as fixed effects, and random cluster (clinic) effects. A total of 766 (83.6%) patients completed 2-year follow-up. A total of 63 (14.1%) and 87 (18.6%) patients in intervention and in usual care, respectively, were lost to follow-up. At 24 months, the adjusted mean SBP was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to usual care (-3.3 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.34, -0.32; p = 0.03). The intervention led to higher BP control (odds ratio 1.51; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.09; p = 0.01), lower odds of high (>20%) 10-year cardiovascular risk score (OR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.97; p = 0.03), and lower mean log albuminuria (-0.22; 95% CI: -0.41, -0.02; p = 0.03). Mean DBP, mortality rates, and serious adverse events including hospitalizations were not different between groups. The main limitation was no masking in the trial.
A multicomponent intervention consisting of physicians trained in risk-based treatment, subsidized SPC medications, nurse-delivered motivational conversation, and telephone follow-ups improved BP control and lowered cardiovascular risk. Wide-scale implementation of a multicomponent intervention such as the one in our trial is likely to reduce hypertension-related morbidity and mortality globally.
Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02972619.
尽管有高血压管理的临床实践指南,但即使在高收入国家,血压(BP)控制仍然不理想(<30%)。本研究旨在评估整合到初级保健系统中的潜在可扩展的多组分干预措施与常规护理相比,对血压控制的有效性。
在新加坡的 8 家政府诊所进行了一项群组随机对照试验。该试验纳入了 916 名年龄≥40 岁的未控制高血压(收缩压(SBP)≥140mmHg 或舒张压(DBP)≥90mmHg)患者。多组分干预措施包括对高血压进行基于风险的治疗的医生培训、补贴的氯沙坦-HCTZ 单片复方(SPC)药物、接受动机对话(MC)培训的护士以及电话随访。常规护理(对照组)包括诊所的常规护理、无 MC 或电话随访以及 SPC 无补贴。主要结局是基线后 24 个月的平均 SBP。4 家诊所(447 名患者)被随机分配到干预组,4 家诊所(469 名)被分配到常规护理组。患者于 2017 年 1 月开始入组,随访时间为 2018 年 12 月至 2020 年 9 月。分析采用意向治疗原则。主要结局是 24 个月的 SBP。在患者水平上使用基于可能性的线性混合模型重复测量分析,对基线、12 个月和 24 个月的 BP 进行建模,采用治疗组、随访、治疗组×随访交互作为固定效应,以及随机聚类(诊所)效应。共有 766 名(83.6%)患者完成了 2 年的随访。干预组和常规护理组分别有 63 名(14.1%)和 87 名(18.6%)患者失访。在 24 个月时,与常规护理相比,干预组的平均 SBP 明显降低(-3.3mmHg;95%CI:-6.34,-0.32;p=0.03)。该干预措施导致血压控制更好(优势比 1.51;95%CI:1.10,2.09;p=0.01)、10 年心血管风险评分较高(>20%)的可能性降低(OR 0.67;95%CI:0.47,0.97;p=0.03),以及平均尿白蛋白降低(-0.22;95%CI:-0.41,-0.02;p=0.03)。两组间平均 DBP、死亡率和包括住院在内的严重不良事件没有差异。主要限制是试验中没有进行盲法。
由接受基于风险的治疗培训的医生、补贴的 SPC 药物、由护士提供的动机对话以及电话随访组成的多组分干预措施改善了血压控制,并降低了心血管风险。在全球范围内广泛实施我们试验中的这种多组分干预措施可能会降低与高血压相关的发病率和死亡率。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02972619。